Some people are using it. I wanted to, but decided I wasn't comfortable relying on it. On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 19:15 Natarajan, Rajeswari < rajeswari.natara...@sap.com> wrote:
> Is replicated level DB store production ready now. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: James A. Robinson [mailto:j...@highwire.org] > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 3:19 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: Activemq HA without shared Database or Shared file system > > I'm not aware of any other choice. I initially tried to use the replicated > leveldb system but ran into too many stability issues. > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 3:17 PM Natarajan, Rajeswari < > rajeswari.natara...@sap.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Would like to know if ActiveMQ supports HA with message replication > > without the shared DB or shared file system > > > > I see that there is a replicated level DB store which requires a zoo > > keeper. Is there any other mechanism available other than these options > > where messages are getting replicated to the standby. > > > > > > Regards, > > Rajeswari > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/replicated-leveldb-store.html > > >
