Is it possible for a consumer to only consume messages above a certain
priority, rather than just get them in priority order? Is so how can
this be done?
I am using ActiveMQ-CPP - latest version.
Happy to help, and I'm glad that let you get it working.
On Sep 1, 2015 10:26 PM, "wang" wrote:
> Hi Tim
> Thank you so much.
> With the following configuration, it works very well.
>
> on server 10.80.1.1, add the networkConnectors as the following:
>
>
>
>
> on se
Hi Tim
Thank you so much.
With the following configuration, it works very well.
on server 10.80.1.1, add the networkConnectors as the following:
uri="static:(tcp://10.80.1.2:61616,tcp://10.80.1.3:61616)"/>
on server 10.80.1.2, add the networkConnectors as the follo
Hi Tim,
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation.
I agree it is not as such bad to see "Producer stopped" message immediately
after "Producer throttled". I merely registered the observations from my
test which had no ProducerWindowSize configured.
Now that my doubts are cleared, let me tr
In that case, you'll want each broker connected simultaneously to both the
other two brokers (but not to themselves!), using the static transport
instead of masterslave (which is really just syntactic sugar for failover,
resulting in a connection to only one of the N underlying URIs). The
easiest
Hi Tim
Thanks for you quick reply.
What I am trying is to look for a network of brokers (where all brokers
are active and forward messages to each other to reach consumers
connected to the other brokers, and where messages may be delivered out
of order compared to when they were sent). But I d
Are you trying to have a master/slave cluster (where only one broker is
active and the others are backups, and where message ordering is
consistent), or are you looking for a network of brokers (where all brokers
are active and forward messages to each other to reach consumers connected
to the othe
James,
There are two independent concepts here:
1. what limit gets evaluated to determine whether the producer should stop
sending messages
2. which producers should be stopped in response
Without ProducerWindowSize, the limits are based on the destination and the
entire store (plus other limits
Hi All,
I followed the instruction under
http://activemq.apache.org/encrypted-passwords.html and it worked perfectly
using Apache 5.11.0 just i made a modification to use
org.jasypt.spring.properties.EncryptablePropertyPlaceholderConfigurer
instead of
org.jasypt.spring31.properties.EncryptableProp
Hi Tim
Thanks for you answer.
I m trying to accomplish here is because I want to put the three brokers
behind a load balancer. So if one broker down, the others could server well.
I read from here
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
on that page it said as the following about
Why have you configured 10.80.1.1 to connect to itself, and why are 2 and 3
default configurations?
More generally, what are you trying to accomplish here?
I assume you've read the content at
http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html, but if not, you need to.
On Sep 1, 2015 3:25 AM, "wang" wro
Hi guys
I am Wang and I facing problem when i configured MQTT master-slave using
activeMQ 5.12
I have three servers: 10.80.1.1, 10.80.1.2, 10.80.1.3
I deployed default activeMQ instance onto 10.80.1.2, 10.80.1.3.
And I added the following networkConnectors to server 10.80.1.1 :
12 matches
Mail list logo
