If you examine the broker via JMX, do you see an increasing number of
messages on the various destinations as the percent usage increases (which
would indicate that the deletions are not succeeding)?
Have you confirmed that messages are not building up in the DLQ (dead
letter queue)? You either n
Ah, I see what you mean now. You can submit an enhancement request in JIRA
(
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel)
to allow the webapp to work when embedded in any web server.
In the meantime, if the fileserver app was a must
If you are using KahaDB you might be running into a limitation of mixing
destinations with fast message rates vs slow message rates. Gary wrote a
good blog post about it here:
http://blog.garytully.com/2011/11/activemq-multiple-kahadb-instances.html
Take a look at that and see if it helps you.
Hello,
I'm using ActiveMQ version 5.10.1.
Since we started using ActiveMQ a few weeks ago, the store percentage for
the broker has been steadily increasing - from 10% at the start of the month
to 29% currently.
In that period, we have processed (sent to queue and subsequently removed)
approximat
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31601236/spring-boot-activemq-modify-broker-url
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/any-one-can-help-me-tp4699931.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
i used brokerURI such as "failover:(tcp://localhost:61616)", so that the
progarm can be work normal even if the MQ server broken. And i have a
question that createConnection（）function whether is a block function?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/createConne
Christopher,
Thank you for showing the way and useful links.
I'll go around of this issue and trying to use JobSchedulerStore method
according your recommendations.
BR,
Oleg
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-use-persistenceAdapter-for-persistent-S
some clarity would be good
On 28 July 2015 at 01:16, William Greene wrote:
> I wish someone could update the Apollo home page to reflect that the
> project is no longer being developed..., to a new user, it appears that
> Apollo was supposed to be the next generation of activemq...
>
> I mean,
I wish someone could update the Apollo home page to reflect that the
project is no longer being developed..., to a new user, it appears that
Apollo was supposed to be the next generation of activemq...
I mean, why did it just die like that A blog post would be helpful on
the Apollo page.
On J
I just upgraded from 5.5 to 5.10 and got bit by this one too. What a pain. I
am glad to see it is still possible to both restrict dynamically included
destinations and still use temp queues however, I do not understand the unit
test that has been presented as an example of how to do that.
My ques
I just upgraded from 5.5 to 5.10 and got bit by this one too. What a pain. I
am glad to see it is still possible to both restrict dynamically included
destinations and still use temp queues however, I do not understand the unit
test that has been presented as an example of how to do that.
My ques
first: I don't know how you did that, but it seems you cross-posted
with all the activemq lists (including commit, commit-subscribe, ... I
had about of 20 entries to remove before I sent this response.
second: Why don't you take a look on ActiveMQ-Artemis. A lot of
Apollo's philosophy has been al
Have you increased the messageTTL to allow more than 1 broker-to-broker
forward? See http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html for
details of that networkConnector property.
Tim
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Cadmean wrote:
> I just found by setting "duplex=true" connection for eve
Hi
No. Apollo is a "dead" project. There is no active development on it.
I suggest to take a look at Apache ActiveMQ or Apache Artemis. They
both have cluster support.
http://activemq.apache.org/
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/
The latter has a better scalable architecture like Apollo (Artem
I already answered this a few emails earlier:
To my current knowledge, Apollo does not support clustering and I
believe there are no plans to implement this in the near future.
Also mentioned by me before, Apollo appears to be "abandoned" due to the
extremely low activity in the source code. S
Hello Tim,
thanks for the answer.
No, its not that simple sadly.
I have reproduced the exception for you and will append it at the end of
this message.
The Class '*jetty.*DefaultServlet.class' is not running within tomcat!
I have looked into the code of that class to see if i can make it run, but
Hi:
I have a very simple broker network. Broker-1 and Broker-2. There's is a
Producer application and Consumer application. The network looks like:
Producer <--> Broker-1<- duplex network connector -> Broker-2
<---> Consumer
The problem is, if Consumer is slow or down. The produced d
Hello,
I am a Apollo enthusiasts, Can you help me?
IS Apollo support cluster deployment, please? If want to implement
clustering, need what to do? Is there a deployment documents? Thank you very
much!!!
Is very urgent!!!
Thanks & Best Regards!
Zhikun LiSolutions Beijing Center
Hi
Does Apache Apollo support Clustering Implementation? Or any plan to add this
feature in the future release?
Thanks
Zongwen Li
I also use message selector for my queue and topic.
HOWEVER, I use string properties instead of JMS properties. Maybe you can
try it.
Zim-Zam O'Pootertoot wrote
> My program is using Java 8 (Oracle JDK) and the activemq-all 5.11.1 jar.
> I
> have a persistent queue of Job objects, and I'm tryi
I just found by setting "duplex=true" connection for every broker, some
channels between brokers are blocked.
So here is my problem again:
I have brokers A,B,C,D and only 1 consumer connected to A, according to the
network connections, all the messages from B,C and D should be forwarded to
A and
Simple answer: no, Apache Apollo does not support a cluster deployment.
Also, by looking at the source code commits, it appears that the project
has been abandoned since there has been no commit to the sources since
January.
If you are really interested in Apollo, you may want to reach out to
The enqueue count didn't increase when you did the second batch of
enqueues, which is a bug. I assume you can reproduce this reliably?
What version are you using? If it's not 5.11.x, can you please try to
reproduce the problem under 5.11.1 to confirm that it's not been resolved
in a later versio
I have facing the negative count in pending message , i have described my
problem in this stackoverflow post
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31652219/negative-count-in-activemq-pending-message
Please help me to solve this problem
Thanks,Mahendran
Thanks a lot, Tim & Chris - almost at the same moment your answers
arrived, I've read about the start() - call on the connection in the
docs - that has been my problem. Now, everything's runnig fine. Also,
I'm glad to receive some advise on how to debug the broker - I guess
that will be useful know
25 matches
Mail list logo
