GC should definitely work.. do they topics have consumers? If they have ANY
consumers this will block GC and they won’t be able to be reclaimed.
Also, the time is reset for each new consumer.
Another note. If you have a LARGE number of topics that need to be GCd,
there’s a bug whereby ActiveMQ l
Hi,
Using ActiveMQ :5.10.0
We faced a strange issue where some messages sent on a topic are not
received by the client. This is non durable client. The issue here is those
mesasges are showing as inflight in jconsole which means broker sent those
messages and acknowledgment is not received by the
Peter ,
Many thanks. I understood it now.
So this means basically that Apollo is now not under development.
Artemis will be the new release.
Thanks for the help.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Apollo-and-Replicated-LevelDB-Store-tp4695502p46955
What does the transportConnector configuration look like?
I believe for MQTT and SSL, you need "ssl+mqtt". Or is it "mqtt+ssl"?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Invalid-TLS-Padding-data-Error-while-trying-to-connect-ActiveMQ-via-SSL-tp4694099p4695546.html
There is no such thing as ActiveMQ 6, yet.
The code base of JBoss HornetQ was donated to the ActiveMQ community. That
contribution was initially named ActiveMQ 6 (hence the git repo name) but
is now known as ActiveMQ Artemis (Apollos twin sister in mythology).
After the donation, a lot of work ha
Hi,
We are not overriding so the defaults of 1s timeout on the receive() and
1,000 prefetch are in play.
We are updating the connection URI to set a much higher timeout.
Interestingly, PHP sending to the very same broker via STOMP gets send()
fail with a 2 second timeout specified. With a 10 sec
Hi many thanks.
So is APollo development completely stopped?
What's the difference between ActiveMQ 6 and Apollo?
In a non replicated environment we found that in case of multiple Jms
Consumers Apollo is faster than ActiveMQ. IS ActiveMQ 6 performance similar
to Apollo
--
View this message in
Hi,
I'm running a network of brokers (activemq 5.9.1) with a continuous flow of
unique short lived topics.
I'm configuring the policyEntry with gcInactiveDestinations="true" but it
looks like these destinations are not being garbage collected even though
they have no regular consumers as I'm seei
there isn't any active development on Apollo at the moment... but if you're
keen to use it, and willing to contribute back, i know there are a few
others that would offer to help :) but at the moment apollo doesn't have
replicated leveldb. you could also take a look at ActiveMQ Artemis which
does h
Hi All,
Sorry if this is a new bie question
Can Apollo be used with replicated levelDB store?
We recently benchmarked apollo and found it very suitable for our usecase.
However we would like to have the option for HA and Failover.
Is there any doc explaining integrating replicated levelDB with A
Hi,
I want to limit the size of the message that is sent to ActiveMQ. I have
clients in Perl, python, Java, C# and php.
What is the best way to put this limit? I know about
wireFormat.maxFrameSize. Does frame size accounts for entire frame or the
message payload only?
Will this be applicable to all
I'm interested in the answer to this question. For messages on a queue
outside of a message group, I believe processing continues during the retry
interval, so I'd guess the same is true for message groups but I don't know
for sure.
On Apr 6, 2015 6:37 AM, "cduvvuri" wrote:
> Would ActiveMq hold
Matt, Gmail had sent all your emails from the past two weeks or so to my
spam folder; if it did the same for other people, that might explain why
you're not getting responses.
Tim
On Apr 6, 2015 7:11 PM, "mattmadhavan" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324
Where/how are you seeing zero consumers? Is this via JMX?
One consumer can't consume from more than one queue, so I'd expect JMX to
show one (different) consumer for each queue.
On Apr 7, 2015 9:33 AM, "ALi" wrote:
> Hello
> We have a server that has four queues and there is only one client
> c
On Apr 17, 2015 6:36 PM, "Kevin Burton" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Tim Bain wrote:
>
> > Yeah, the whole paradigm of CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE is "I know what I'm
doing,
> > don't worry about me, I'll tell you when we're good to go." As long as
the
> > client is alive and still connect
Is it always the same 36 messages that aren't consumed? Also, do your 60
consumers use any selectors?
On Apr 17, 2015 9:26 AM, "mattmadhavan" wrote:
> Hello,
> I have been stuck in the problem for a while. I have large volumes of
> request messages that are produced by a 'server' app. The reques
what sort of timeout is on the receive(...) from spring dmlc, and what
is the prefetch for that consumer. It appears that the message is
getting dispatched but not consumed, the connection/consumer dies and
the message is flagged as a redelivery. then the before delivery check
on the delivery count
We have a camel route consuming from ActiveMQ (5.10.0 with KahaDB) and
frequently get a DLQ entry without anything logged through our errorHandler.
The only thing we have to go on is a dlqFailureCause header which says:
java.lang.Throwable: Exceeded redelivery policy limit:RedeliveryPolicy
{desti
Thanks for your response
> From: petter.nordlan...@enfo.se
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: what is store limit ?
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 07:13:14 +
>
> Hi,
>
> The store is disk space (etc) allocated to the persistence store.
> Typically this means the KahaDB disk space.
> Th
Hi,
I have also just started using NIO in my setup. The average memory usage is
same what it used to be with TCP but threads usage reduced a lot. Another
thing is I observe that memory usage oscillates a lot in case of NIO. I am
not sure if its a good thing ? May be someone from ActiveMQ dev team c
Hi,
The store is disk space (etc) allocated to the persistence store.
Typically this means the KahaDB disk space.
The memory limit is how much ²RAM² memory (java heap space) that can be
allocated for messages.
Only persistent messages get put to store, so you need to set the
temporary store for n
21 matches
Mail list logo