There is no such thing as ActiveMQ 6, yet. The code base of JBoss HornetQ was donated to the ActiveMQ community. That contribution was initially named ActiveMQ 6 (hence the git repo name) but is now known as ActiveMQ Artemis (Apollos twin sister in mythology).
After the donation, a lot of work has been made to merge features and code from ActiveMQ and ActiveMQ Apollo to the new code base. I guess that ActiveMQ Artemis in the long run will be the best-of-breed from ActiveMQ, Apollo and HornetQ. Likely, but that is just a speculation from my side, ActiveMQ Artemis will be released as ActiveMQ 6.0 some day when there is a migration path from previous ActiveMQ versions. About performance compared with ActiveMQ Apollo, nothing is really known as there is no release of ActiveMQ Artemis yet. Both use non blocking architecture to be able to scale under heavy load and large amount of connections. Best Regards Petter Nordlander Den 2015-04-23 17:24 skrev amit2103 <ami...@nrifintech.com>: >Hi many thanks. >So is APollo development completely stopped? > >What's the difference between ActiveMQ 6 and Apollo? >In a non replicated environment we found that in case of multiple Jms >Consumers Apollo is faster than ActiveMQ. IS ActiveMQ 6 performance >similar >to Apollo > > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Apollo-and-Replicated-Level >DB-Store-tp4695502p4695529.html >Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.