Hi. Hoping that someone might have some insight into what we're seeing in our
activemq.log file.
We're running ActiveMQ 5.8 and in the activemq.log file we see lots of messages
like this:
2013-10-11 09:03:57,212 | WARN | Transport Connection to:
tcp://10.251.128.28:42015 failed: java.io.EOFEx
So if discardingDLQBrokerPlugin discard the message before sending to DLQ,.
I have also seen the same functionality by-->
So what is the difference between both of them ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Disc
I wrote 3 Java apps whose GUIs update upon receiving messages from AMQ.
While AMQ runs 24/7/365, my apps only run for as long as the user's shift
lasts (up to 10 hours). However, after AMQ is running for about 4 days, one
(or more) of these three apps seems to lose its ability to receive messages
Hi Everyone, I have a message queue named amq570queue, after accumulating 2
million messages it started to slow down. What broker settings do I need to
adjust to fix this issue? I temporarily moved it into a new message queue(in
the same broker) and it is working fine. I initially thought that the
Hi,
Does someone know the answer to this? I haven't been able to find anything
for configuring sendFailIfNoSpace at the Destination level (specific queues
in particular for me).
If it does not exist, and someone can explain why (e.g. how it's not
appropriate) that would also help my understanding
true but in fact, the scheduler has its own 'home grown' kahadb like
store - and really needs to be layered over the existing persistence
adapters - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3758 - on the
todo list for 5.10
On 22 October 2013 17:30, Christian Posta wrote:
> There is a separate st
There is a strange problem either in activemq or camel which breaks
everything when it happens. This problem cannot be reproduced but
happens randomly once in a while. What happens is that in a request/reply
pattern, the reply is of type ActiveMQMessage instead of the expected
ActiveMQObjectMess
There is a separate store for scheduled messages.
KahaDB is implemented.
There is no impl for leveldb yet.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Does level db have support for that scheduled persistent store?
> http://activemq.apache.org/delay-and-schedule-message-delivery.ht
Does level db have support for that scheduled persistent store?
http://activemq.apache.org/delay-and-schedule-message-delivery.html
Or maybe I am mistaking or remembering wrong that the scheduler has a
separate store from the regular store for its scheduled messages.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:0
I am trying to modify the activemq webapp to dynamically visualize data using
highcharts. Specially, the following code works fine where chart1.js does
the basic highchart line draw. As soon as I uncomment amq.js, the chart
stops showing up. It is a known issue?
thanks
--
Vie
of the ~3k unit tests - many use the default store and we have not
switched the default store. Until we do, and work through any issues
we won't know for sure. We plan to do that before we make it the
default.
The only known caveat atm is priority support, levelDb does not
respect JMS priority in t
Per Claus Ibsen's blog post:
"Over time level db is planned to be default out of the box persistent
store, instead of the current kahadb store. Though we are not there
yet, so kahadb is still the default store."
What does "we are not there yet" mean? What are the caveats regarding
LevelDB usage?
Any suggestions? Is my configuration correct?
Giovanni
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Connection-over-FleetBroadband-satellite-tp4672977p4673089.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
you need to use a small journal file size b/c the journal is reclaimed
when data files are unreferenced. for an example test see:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/bugs/TransactedStoreUsageSuspendResumeTest.java
On 17 October 2013
before - the dlq is not used.
On 22 October 2013 06:39, Sophia Wright wrote:
> Thanks for the reply,
>
> So as the page that you mentioned says "discardingDLQBrokerPlugin" allows
> the configuration of queues and topics to drop messages that have been sent
> to the DLQ.
> But when I see the sourc
15 matches
Mail list logo