There is a separate store for scheduled messages. KahaDB is implemented. There is no impl for leveldb yet.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does level db have support for that scheduled persistent store? > http://activemq.apache.org/delay-and-schedule-message-delivery.html > > Or maybe I am mistaking or remembering wrong that the scheduler has a > separate store from the regular store for its scheduled messages. > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > of the ~3k unit tests - many use the default store and we have not > > switched the default store. Until we do, and work through any issues > > we won't know for sure. We plan to do that before we make it the > > default. > > The only known caveat atm is priority support, levelDb does not > > respect JMS priority in the same way as kahaDB or JDBC does. > > > > On 22 October 2013 15:25, Paul Gale <paul.n.g...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Per Claus Ibsen's blog post: > >> > >> "Over time level db is planned to be default out of the box persistent > >> store, instead of the current kahadb store. Though we are not there > >> yet, so kahadb is still the default store." > >> > >> What does "we are not there yet" mean? What are the caveats regarding > >> LevelDB usage? > >> > >> Copious detail is much appreciated. > >> > >> Just wondering. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Paul > > > > > > > > -- > > http://redhat.com > > http://blog.garytully.com > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > Red Hat, Inc. > Email: cib...@redhat.com > Twitter: davsclaus > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
