Here is my setup
I have a master/slave (apache-activemq-5.8.0) configuration using MySql
database as a shared storage.
Next a client connects to the current master broker via
failover:(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://int-host2:61616)?randomize=false and posts
a message with a delayed delivery to a queu
Here is my setup
I have a master/slave (apache-activemq-5.8.0) configuration using MySql
database as a shared storage.
Next a client connects to the current master broker via
failover:(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://int-host2:61616)?randomize=false and posts
a message with a delayed delivery to a queu
Yes, that works.
Thanks a lot Torsten!
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Torsten Mielke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can you try
>
> >
> > http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
> id="myPlugin" class="org.myorg.MyPlugin"/>
> >
>
>
> instead?
> I recently got a destination interceptor to
Dear Distinguished Colleagues:
I would like to be able to drop slow consumers . If a slow consumer is
detected, I want it gone, and I want an advisory message to say "this
consumer was dropped". I can't find good documentation for this. Any
ideas ?
--
Regards,
Oleg Dulin
http://www.olegdulin
Hi,
We're having issues using activemq 5.8.0 with PHP stomp. In our live
environment we were noticing that the queue would stop processing, and
readFrame would return false even though there were still messages in the
queue. When it hands, restarting stomp usually fixes the problem and new
messag
Is it using the config you think it's using?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:25 AM, ariskk wrote:
> 2 test cases use two brokers. One is configured to not use jmx:
>
> xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-in
Interestingly, hasFrame does acknowledge that a frame is there, it's just
that readFrame returns a null/blank message.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Activemq-Stomp-queue-gets-stuck-tp4671453p4671455.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive
Hi,
Using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 on RHEL 6.1
I'd like some clarification as to what is the expected behavior when one
follows these steps:
1. Using the web console create a durable topic subscriber. In my case
it was for an existing (and busy) topic (let's call it foo), the selector
was blank a
2 test cases use two brokers. One is configured to not use jmx:
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema
Yes there are interceptors in ActiveMQ.
In AMQ land I don't think we distinguish between interceptors and broker
plugins. The terms are used interchangeably.
However there are broker plugins (or interceptors) and destination
interceptors.
Broker plugins are documented at
http://fusesource.com
The answers really depends on your use case and how you want to leverage the
brokers.
However the most typical topologies in general are a full mesh (every broker
connected to all other brokers) and hub-and-spoke (one hub broker and multiple
store brokers that connect to the hub).
But again t
Hello,
Can you try
>
> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; id="myPlugin"
> class="org.myorg.MyPlugin"/>
>
instead?
I recently got a destination interceptor to work that way and had to specify
the namespace for correctly.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmi
Broker networks generally use the openwire transport (i.e. tcp://host:port).
In the network connector most people either use static: or masterslave:
The latter if they want to connect to a master/slave broker pair.
I have not seem multicast being used a lot.
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-
Hello,
I made a new BrokerPlugin as described here:
http://fusesource.com/docs/mirrors/activemq/features/interceptors.html
I edited activemq.xml to add a "plugins" element to "broker" like this:
http://activemq.org/config/1.0"; brokerName="localhost"
dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data" plugins
I've tried the masterslave discovery agent on broker amq3 & the failover from
master (amq1) to slave (amq2) works.
However, masterslave doesn't seem to support priorityBackup=true & so the
broker doesn't fail-back from slave to master when the master comes back
online.
My original issue is that
Well, before read your reply, yesterday we went to this page
http://activemq.apache.org/activation-spec-properties.html and we saw the
"maxSessions", "maxMessagesPerSessions" and "maxMessagesPerBatch"
properties.
Apparently this is the solution we were looking for, because changing its
value our MD
Hi,
is there in ActiveMQ a concept like Interceptors and Phases like in Apache
CXF?
I'd like to plug in some custom functionality in the sending and receiving
part of the messaging.
In CXF I would do something like
Is there
17 matches
Mail list logo