Is it using the config you think it's using?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:25 AM, ariskk <kostas.koug...@googlemail.com>wrote: > 2 test cases use two brokers. One is configured to not use jmx: > > <beans > xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; > xsi:schemaLocation=" > http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans > http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd > http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core > http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core.xsd";> > > > <bean > > class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer"> > <property name="locations"> > <value>file:${config.jms}/test.properties</value> > </property> > </bean> > > > <broker xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; > brokerName="localhosttest" dataDirectory="${activemq.data}" useJmx="false"> > > <managementContext> > <managementContext createConnector="false" > createMBeanServer="false"/> > </managementContext> > > <persistenceAdapter> > <kahaDB directory="${activemq.data}/kahadb"/> > </persistenceAdapter> > > > <transportConnectors> > > <transportConnector name="openwire" > > uri="tcp:// > 0.0.0.0:61616?maximumConnections=1000&wireformat.maxFrameSize=104857600 > "/> > </transportConnectors> > </broker> > </beans> > > But still when both tests run in the same jvm, the 2nd one fails because it > tries to create the jmx: > > Caused by: javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException: > org.apache.activemq:BrokerName=localhost,Type=Broker > at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.Repository.addMBean(Repository.java:437) > at > > com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.registerWithRepository(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:1898) > at > > com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.registerDynamicMBean(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:966) > at > > com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.registerObject(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:900) > at > > com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.registerMBean(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:324) > at > > com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.JmxMBeanServer.registerMBean(JmxMBeanServer.java:522) > at > > org.apache.activemq.broker.jmx.ManagementContext.registerMBean(ManagementContext.java:366) > at > > org.apache.activemq.broker.jmx.AnnotatedMBean.registerMBean(AnnotatedMBean.java:72) > at > > org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.startManagementContext(BrokerService.java:2370) > at > org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.start(BrokerService.java:567) > at > > org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerService.afterPropertiesSet(XBeanBrokerService.java:58) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) > at > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.invokeCustomInitMethod(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1608) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.invokeInitMethods(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1549) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.initializeBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1479) > ... 65 more > > > it goes down to BrokerService.isUseJmx() which is called by BrokerService > but it returns true while in my config is false. Any ideas? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/useJmx-false-two-brokers-getting-exception-due-to-jmx-tp4671456.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
