well, I will file a jira to track this issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/What-can-be-reason-of-460-memory-usage-limit-tp4665651p4665847.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 04/10/2013 03:38 PM, Rohit Magazine wrote:
How can i have the same correlation ID for the COA then ?
Is there someother way of doing it ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMSMessageID-not-getting-set-while-sending-message-tp4665820p4665839.html
Sent f
Hi Colin,
(I'm moving this to the Users list, instead of the Dev list)
I think using a selector should accomplish what you want. Here's an
example.
IDestination dest = GetDestination(); // Get the destination interface
IMessageConsumer msgConsumer = session.CreateConsumer(dest, "MYPROP =
'thev
How can i have the same correlation ID for the COA then ?
Is there someother way of doing it ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMSMessageID-not-getting-set-while-sending-message-tp4665820p4665839.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
i want check system is slave or master.
do we have any other way to find that using activee-mq 5.8
Please kindly suggest.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/active-mq-5-8-property-to-find-system-is-slave-or-master-tp4665830p4665837.html
Sent from the Act
On 04/10/2013 02:34 PM, Christian Posta wrote:
Yah, missed that. Was looking right at the trunk :)
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:32 AM, prabumc...@gmail.com
wrote:
sorry for last message
correct URL
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4330
--
View this message in context:
http://active
Yah, missed that. Was looking right at the trunk :)
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:32 AM, prabumc...@gmail.com wrote:
> sorry for last message
>
> correct URL
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4330
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/active
sorry for last message
correct URL
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4330
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/active-mq-5-8-property-to-find-system-is-slave-or-master-tp4665830p4665834.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-433
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/active-mq-5-8-property-to-find-system-is-slave-or-master-tp4665830p4665833.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It should not be removed in 5.8, that is, that property should still be
avail.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, prabumc...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I need small java program to find which system is currently master or
> slave?
>
> active-mq 5.5 had isslave property,But that is remo
Hi all,
I need small java program to find which system is currently master or
slave?
active-mq 5.5 had isslave property,But that is removed in 5.8.
Not,sure which property i can use for to find system is master or slave.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n
On 04/10/2013 02:14 PM, prabumc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am having web application to view messages in the messaging system which
is running in active-mg 5.5.
Last week we have upgrade apache active-mq from 5.5 to 5.8.
due to this upgrade,We can't view queues/messages in my web app
Hi All,
I am having web application to view messages in the messaging system which
is running in active-mg 5.5.
Last week we have upgrade apache active-mq from 5.5 to 5.8.
due to this upgrade,We can't view queues/messages in my web application.
I am using apache-mq-all-5.8.jar api to conn
On 04/10/2013 11:17 AM, Rohit Magazine wrote:
My code sends a message to a queue and get a COA back. I am using C#.Net and
NMS.
Apache.NMS version 1.5.1.2739
Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ version 1.5.6.2746
I am setting the following properties of the message
Apache.NMS.IMessage request;
...
request = se
On 04/10/2013 10:56 AM, cheekychops wrote:
There's a bug in org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory which
causes the following log message when you try to set the
timeBetweenExpirationCheckMillis property:
org.springframework.beans.GenericTypeAwarePropertyDescriptor [WARN] Invalid
Java
I have ActiveMQ setup via a camel route and i'm consuming messages from a
queue.
My problem is, if i only have 1 consumer that consumer will only consume 1
message every 30 seconds to a minute or so.
If i setup up more concurrent consumers then each consumer will consume a
message until each co
There's a bug in org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory which
causes the following log message when you try to set the
timeBetweenExpirationCheckMillis property:
org.springframework.beans.GenericTypeAwarePropertyDescriptor [WARN] Invalid
JavaBean property 'timeBetweenExpirationCheckMill
My code sends a message to a queue and get a COA back. I am using C#.Net and
NMS.
Apache.NMS version 1.5.1.2739
Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ version 1.5.6.2746
I am setting the following properties of the message
Apache.NMS.IMessage request;
...
request = session.CreateBytesMessage(someStringToSend);
...
Hello to all, I have an AMQ boorker with BridgeConnectors to an TibcoMQ
6.0.1. All seem to work but in the web console and also in JMX interface (
via jconsole) i never seen the bridge but only the local Queues.All work but
in console on Network Tab no connection are display. How can I modify my
what version are you working with here?
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:23 AM, mmg wrote:
> We are receiving the below exception after every 3 to 4 days of running.
>
> Exception in thread "ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///10.80.0.35:38499"
> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.activemq.command.ReplayC
On 04/10/2013 07:59 AM, Marco Paladini wrote:
Hi there,
I had various segmentation fault errors when running the examples:
http://activemq.apache.org/cms/cms-api-overview.html
http://activemq.apache.org/cms/example.html
I'm using activemq-cpp-3.6.0 compiled from source since I did not find
any
I believe you're correct. If PFC is disabled, when the store cursor checks
limits, it checks only the memory percentage of its own MemoryUsage and
compares it to the high water mark. Otherwise if PFC is enabled, it checks
whether the MemoryUsage is "full" but the "isFull" method also checks its
par
Hi there,
I had various segmentation fault errors when running the examples:
http://activemq.apache.org/cms/cms-api-overview.html
http://activemq.apache.org/cms/example.html
I'm using activemq-cpp-3.6.0 compiled from source since I did not find
any package for Ubuntu.
The problem is that the ex
add a test case to demonstrate the exceeded memory usage percent.
When the memory usage limit of queues is larger than the global/broker
memory usage limit and PFC is disable, the exceeded memory usage percent is
present.I believe this is a unsuitable configuration while the broker keeps
dumb.
Th
It's still blocking at start (or at createSession if I invert those lines)
and return a TimeoutException after 1 min in the method calling the WCF.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-with-WCF-blocking-in-startup-tp4665764p4665799.html
Sent from the A
25 matches
Mail list logo
