Ok. Sure, will try that. So I assume that with usePrefetchExtension=false, it
doesn't matter whats the prefetch size. Correct?
With Prefetch Size 0 we initially saw messages getting consumed faster but
after a while, consumption rate became dead slow and queue size kept on
increasing to a very hig
I tried to integrate the web console only, (v5.6) and here the exception
thrown:
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Problems-deploying-AMQ-web-console-in-Tomcat-7-tp4659230p4659402.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
try with PolicyEntry usePrefetchExtension=false, the use case for that
came originally from the RAR, but I think it will work.
btw: what issues do you have with the pull model, prefetch=0
On 15 November 2012 15:26, himanshu_s83 wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We have a case whereby we've set jms.prefetchPolicy
Hi!
We have a case whereby we've set jms.prefetchPolicy.queuePrefetch=1 and we
see that we have 2 outstanding messages in consumer's session queue. 1
getting processed and 1 waiting. Problem is that the processing message
might take long time to complete and send ack back to Broker causing the
oth
I am looking to replace a small number (<30) of MQSeries queue managers with
AMQ. The current topology connects all QMs via a central QM hub with
channels defined for each.
I have 3 options for the replacement topology:
brokers on each machine with a central hub
brokers on each machine with no
Hi,
I am running a simple point-to-point example and trying to run 8
requests from a client to a server.
When I run it as is – it goes fast and finishes.
When I changed the server to support spring and use jmstemplate to send the
message, the reply is slower and gets stuck eventually.
Any i
Hi, according to this link:
http://activemq.apache.org/jmstemplate-gotchas.html
there are problems with using the
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory
and a pooled one should be used instead.
I couldn't find the PooledConnectionFactory anywhere.
Any recommendations on which pool shoul
There's been some discussion on batches for JMS2 - see
http://java.net/jira/browse/JMS_SPEC-36
On 14 November 2012 21:13, Gary Tully wrote:
> Auto batching does not exist at the moment but it would be a nice
> enhancement.
> ie: configure some sort of client side pause time or size limit so
> th
the root cause is the interaction of the journal and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3695
On 15 November 2012 11:33, Gary Tully wrote:
> Please raise a jira issue to track this. it is not a known issue.
> If you don't use virtual topics, a workaround is to set
> useVirtualTopics=false o
Please raise a jira issue to track this. it is not a known issue.
If you don't use virtual topics, a workaround is to set
useVirtualTopics=false on the broker element in xml config.
On 15 November 2012 11:23, Tobb wrote:
> We have AMQ 5.6.0 set up using a journaledPersistenceAdapter. In the last
We have AMQ 5.6.0 set up using a journaledPersistenceAdapter. In the last few
days we've experienced numerous problems relating to this. It seems that
when AMQ is shut down, it dumps its state into the journal files, but when
we try to start the AMQ service again, it fails due to:
To solve this,
We have integrated it with a little java program that create the connection
to AMQ:
and added this to the tomcat web.xml file:
ceposta wrote
> Please explain how you integrated with Tomcat a little more.
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:16 AM, EveX <
> calegan@
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>>
On Nov 14, 2012, at 4:55 PM, mtod wrote:
> Thanks Torsten for the reply
>
> I'm looking for the syntax or process to use a PL/SQL (Internal Oracle)
> query that would route the message to ActiveMQ from Oracle.
>
> I have everything setup down to the client I can even send messages from the
> Or
13 matches
Mail list logo
