try with PolicyEntry usePrefetchExtension=false, the use case for that came originally from the RAR, but I think it will work.
btw: what issues do you have with the pull model, prefetch=0 On 15 November 2012 15:26, himanshu_s83 <himanshu_...@yahoo.co.in> wrote: > Hi! > > We have a case whereby we've set jms.prefetchPolicy.queuePrefetch=1 and we > see that we have 2 outstanding messages in consumer's session queue. 1 > getting processed and 1 waiting. Problem is that the processing message > might take long time to complete and send ack back to Broker causing the > other message to keep waiting forever, waiting for the existing processing > message to get completed. > > Can we change this waiting message number to 0 so that session queue doesn't > have any unconsumed message so that Broker can dispatch that waiting message > to some other free consumer. Right now we have free consumers but due to > this long processing time of currently getting processed message, the other > message keeps waiting forever. > > If I put it to 0, it becomes pull model which also we have some problems. We > want push model only but only 1 message per consumer which is under > processing i.e no other message should wait for this consumer if other > consumers are free. > > Thanks > Himanshu > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/jms-prefetchPolicy-queuePrefetch-1-means-2-outstanding-messages-tp4659398.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- http://redhat.com http://blog.garytully.com
