This depends on the send model you choose.
When async sending messages,there is no guarantee to ensure messages are
processed by broker successfullyor not.
In fact broker will not response to the producer at all,but this can bring
great throughput improvement indeed.
While sync sending messages,
I tried this and found out that calling addConnector() post-start won't do
anything. But I can make a tiny sub-class that will:
public class BrokerService2
extends BrokerService
{
@Override
public TransportConnector addConnector(final TransportConnector
connector
Is it possible to add a new transport connector to a broker post starting the
BrokerService?
I'd like to start up a broker w/o any transports for vm:// use only, but may
need to configure a transport (tcp or ssl) after the application is already up
and using the broker, so it would be a pita to
We found the following link:
http://activemq.apache.org/what-is-the-difference-between-persistent-and-non-persistent-delivery.html
to help explain the difference between persistent and non-persistent
delivery. This makes a lot more sense now.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.228
I did read that javadoc before, just wanted some additional assurance from the
community that this was indeed accurate. Sounds like it is. Thanks :-)
--jason
On Dec 8, 2011, at 1:45 AM, Torsten Mielke wrote:
> From the Javadoc of PooledConnectionFactory:
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/mave
We are looking at using Active MQ for our application's messaging needs,
Our requirement primarily focuses on being able to use persisted message
capability with very high volumes.
We were expecting to take advantage of the Asynchronous IO feature when
running on Linux.
Rob Davies indicated on a
We are looking at using Active MQ for our application's messaging needs,
ur requirement primarily focuses on being able to use persisted message
capability with very high volumns.
We were expecting to take advantage of the Asynchronous IO feature when
running on Linux.
Rob Davies indicated on a t
Hello,
I'm relatively new to ActiveMQ and related topics.
What I'm trying to accomplish is creating a sort of event driven
architecture with ActiveMQ and WS-eventing.
I have a PHP SOAP client and webservice that send/receive events from an
application.
These events need to be published to topics u
This is exactly the starting point I needed...
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/In-Memory-HA-Failover-tp4172576p4172675.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If you only want to buffer and share temporary data, then use a local
embedded broker with in memory persistence (broker attribute
persistent=false) per node/app/region. Network (discovery
networkConnector) the embedded brokers together so that when they are
active they will be able to share messag
Hello,
I am wondering if there is any way to allow me to use ApacheMQ in a
HA/Failover/Cluster configuration but not rely on local disk. This is for a
cloud based deployment where accessing shared local disk is too slow (same
as shared db) - I don't care about message durability - they can get l
A common gotcha is putting the config out of order as to what the XML
schema requires.
It is highly intolerant of out of order entries.
On 8 December 2011 09:42, Torsten Mielke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Your AMQ installation should contain some sample broker configuration that
> uses a network bridge,
From the Javadoc of PooledConnectionFactory:
http://activemq.apache.org/maven/5.5.0/activemq-pool/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/pool/PooledConnectionFactory.html
"A JMS provider which pools Connection, Session and MessageProducer instances
so it can be used with tools like Camel and Spring's Jms
Hello,
Your AMQ installation should contain some sample broker configuration that uses
a network bridge, e.g. activemq-static-network-broker2.xml. Check you config
against these samples.
Or alternatively attach your config here and we may have a look.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tm
14 matches
Mail list logo
