Hi ,
I am new to ActiveMQ but not to JMS. I have worked with JMS extensively with
'application servers' like WebLogic and JBoss.
I am finding the terminology in the documentation confusing because of its
non-JMS nature. Specifically, I have a few queries :
1. What is this whole business of Conn
Hm,
from the code it should work. I use message scheduling with 5.4.2 and
it works as espected here.
Bye,
Norman
2010/12/23 devnull :
>
> I have the following method:
>
> http://pastebin.com/8hHV7HxL
>
> I'm trying to set a delay of 120 seconds to re-deliver a message to a queue.
> Instead of w
I have the following method:
http://pastebin.com/8hHV7HxL
I'm trying to set a delay of 120 seconds to re-deliver a message to a queue.
Instead of waiting the 120 seconds it goes into the Queue immediately and is
available for dequeue. Not expected results.
I'm running 5.5-snapshot
does that co
Thanks again...
One more question... is the priority algorithm applied by default or do the
queues need to be configured as in this documentation;
http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/J
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 10:20 -0800, rliguori wrote:
> Got it, thanks.
>
> So where is the priority algorithm applied? On the broker after the
> message(s) are sent?
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
Its rather complicated as it has a lot to do with the Message Store and
in memory caching so there's not re
Got it, thanks.
So where is the priority algorithm applied? On the broker after the
message(s) are sent?
Thanks again.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMSPriority-implemented-in-AMQ-5-4-1-tp3162256p3162416.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing lis
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 09:50 -0800, rliguori wrote:
> "Did you set the priority on the MessageProducer ?"
> >> No, I set the priority of the individual messages. Example:
> >> message.setJMSPriority(9); Why would I set the priority on the producer,
> >> please provide an example and explain, if yo
Is the JMS TCK part of the Java EE TCK, or does the Java EE TCK perform
various JMS tests outside of the JMS TCK?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-ActiveMQ-5-4-2-compliant-against-the-JMS-TCK-tp3091508p3162385.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing li
"Did you set the priority on the MessageProducer ?"
>> No, I set the priority of the individual messages. Example:
>> message.setJMSPriority(9); Why would I set the priority on the producer,
>> please provide an example and explain, if you don't mind.
--
View this message in context:
http://ac
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 09:22 -0800, rliguori wrote:
> "I think this part of the spec is terrible."
> >> It does leave a lot to be desired.
>
> "It is so vague you can do nothing to order by priority and still claim
> compliance. "
> >>I agree it is vague, but my interpretation is that "something"
Yes, I see the component listed in the release notes, but there is no
compliancy claim.
As such, I created a post on the Geronimo forum:
http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/JMS-TCK-Compliancy-for-ActiveMQ-td2137014.html.
I'm just looking for a resource to definately state, ActiveMQ versi
"I think this part of the spec is terrible."
>> It does leave a lot to be desired.
"It is so vague you can do nothing to order by priority and still claim
compliance. "
>>I agree it is vague, but my interpretation is that "something" must be
implemented. Examine this statement, "it should do it
"I think this part of the spec is terrible."
>> It does leave a lot to be desired.
"It is so vague you can do nothing to order by priority and still claim
compliance. "
>>I agree it is vague, but my interpretation is that "something" must be
implemented. Examine this statement, "it should do it
FWIW, I think this part of the spec is terrible. It is so vague you can do
nothing to order by priority and still claim compliance.
The queue code I am working on allows one to choose between AMQ and IBM
MQSeries. With the latter, the data really is ordered by priority, with
AMQ it is not. It m
Behaviour is the same for 5.4.2 and 5.5-snapshot
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Producer-flow-control-question-tp3092808p3162283.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Two interesting links I found:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=64892
http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMSPriority-implemented-in-AMQ-5-4-1-tp3162256p3162281.ht
Does ActiveMQ 5.4.1 support JMSPriority based on the the JMS API 1.1.
specification:
"JMS does not require that a provider strictly implement priority ordering
of
messages; however, it should do its best to deliver expedited messages ahead
of normal messages."
If it does, I would like to see the
Pretty sure that this is related to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2683
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Producer-flow-control-question-tp3092808p3162218.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Turns out it doesn't have anything to do with the JMSTemplate. As far as I
can tell, producer flow control doesn't work for topics. Unless I've missed
something fundamental, I've included a test case that proves that. If you
run the code you'll see the producer halt when PFC kicks in, and never st
Johan,
Thank you. How do I get hold of the CamelContext instance that is defined in
the ActiveMQ configuration.
I looked at StartAndStopRoutesTest.java and it creates a new CamelContext.
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Programmatically-changing-Ca
Ok the client code works well with Chrome and Safari. It connects itself to
the topic, gets the messages and make them visible.
Instead when running with Firefox (any version) and Opera it doesn't work. I
can see from the admin page of ActiveMQ that there's a consumer who dequeues
the messages, h
21 matches
Mail list logo
