Not sur this is the best solution or not, after creating script for running
in background, SMF running ok.
andre.nas wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> Maybe someone experience using SMF on solaris. I make SMF Manifest but,
> after couple minute the activemq is under maintenance. If i run manually
> evert
I have the same problem. Here is the solution:
when in debug mode, use activemq-cppd.lib(don't use activemq-cpp.lib:
crash)；when in release mode, use activemq-cpp.lib(don't use
activemq-cppd.lib)。
andrew.marlow wrote:
>
> I have been seeing an intermittent heap corruption in my AMQ-cpp program
Using jTDS JDBC driver instead of sqljdbc(4).jar seems sloved the problem.
Works fine so far ..
cobrien wrote:
>
> Each instance will try to run "SELECT FOR UPDATE" to
> acquire a lock.
>
> I would first check if the "SELECT FOR UPDATE" syntax is supported by
> your version of SQL Ser
Is there any way to do the following in ActiveMQ?
1) Suppose a regular topic with realtime messages passing through it.
2) We want to archive all messages that pass through the topic permanently
somewhere.
3) Any new consumer (not a durable subscriber) connecting to the topic may
elect to have
Hi,
I was trying to connect a number of different consumers and producers to the
stomp URI (61613), i noticed that the maximum number i can "connect" is
about 300.
Actually the listener port allows for many more, but the issue arises at
connecting.
What directive is causing this "connect" to be
Each instance will try to run "SELECT FOR UPDATE" to acquire
a lock.
I would first check if the "SELECT FOR UPDATE" syntax is supported by
your version of SQL Server.
I think at one time this syntax was not supported. See
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=327394&seqNum=2.
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 08:25 -0700, manua wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I am using activemq-cpp-library-3.2.0-src.tar.gz and
> /usr/lib/libapr-1.so.0.2.11.
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8114 2010-06-21 11:35 /usr/local/apr/lib/apr.exp
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5165 2010-06-21 11:38
> /usr/local/ap
Hi Tim,
I am using activemq-cpp-library-3.2.0-src.tar.gz and
/usr/lib/libapr-1.so.0.2.11.
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8114 2010-06-21 11:35 /usr/local/apr/lib/apr.exp
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5165 2010-06-21 11:38
/usr/local/apr/lib/aprutil.exp
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 806606 2010-06-21
Thanks.
However, change false to true will cause:
2010-07-13 10:52:14,515 [Thread-2 ] INFO
ResourceXmlApplicationContext - Refreshing
org.apache.xbean.spring.context.resourcexmlapplicationcont...@96b5c2:
display name
[org.apache.xbean.spring.context.resourcexmlapplicationcont...@96b5c2]
Hi,
jars from lib/optional are loaded as well, so keep only one instance
of the library in those folders.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On
t;:[17,1005000322]},{"string":[382,1]},{"string":[39,2]},{"string":[14,100]},{"string":[11,230421007130001002]},{"string":[37,1610613204]},{"string":[38,100]},{"string":[20,0]},{"string":[150,2]},{"string":[151,0]},{"strin
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 07:02 -0700, manua wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> My program crashes on activemq::library::ActiveMQCPP::initializeLibrary();
>
> I am using ActriveMQ 5.3 with i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux box and
> compiler is gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33).
>
> Thanks,
> Manu
>
>
Whi
Hi Tim,
My program crashes on activemq::library::ActiveMQCPP::initializeLibrary();
I am using ActriveMQ 5.3 with i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux box and
compiler is gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33).
Thanks,
Manu
Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 06:02 -0700, manua wrote
Ok, now I was under the impression .jars go into the lib folder and
lib/optional was not loaded? If there is a file in lib will it take
precedence over the lib/optional? or will it be ignored? I ask because I
realize I had jettision 1.2 inside of the activemq/lib folder and jettision
1.1 inside of
Hi,
yes, putting Jettison 1.0 in lib/optional folder (and deleting the one
that comes with the distro) should do the trick for now.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http
So you are saying that I should be downgrading to Jettison 1.0?
Dejan Bosanac wrote:
>
> I just tested and it seems that Jettison 1.2 produces the same JSON.
> The tests were passing in ActiveMQ as core module was still using 1.0
> version. So the only workaround for now is to actually downg
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 06:02 -0700, manua wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I getting the following error while creating the object in AMQ,
>
> #0 0x002cd777 in apr_atomic_add32 (mem=0x95123ec, val=4294967295) at
> atomic/unix/mutex.c:78
> #1 0x016208b8 in
> decaf::util::concurrent::atomic::AtomicIntege
Hi All,
I getting the following error while creating the object in AMQ,
#0 0x002cd777 in apr_atomic_add32 (mem=0x95123ec, val=4294967295) at
atomic/unix/mutex.c:78
#1 0x016208b8 in
decaf::util::concurrent::atomic::AtomicInteger::decrementAndGet
(this=0x95123e8)
at decaf/util/conc
Hello, Dejan,
Thanks a lot for the reply.
Could you, please, verify if the this configuration is OK for disabling DLQ?
Unfortunately, when I use it, ActiveMQ.DLQ gets created:
$ cat activemq.xml
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:amq="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"
I just tested and it seems that Jettison 1.2 produces the same JSON.
The tests were passing in ActiveMQ as core module was still using 1.0
version. So the only workaround for now is to actually downgrade to
1.0. I'll try to see what's changed in between and if it can/should be
fixed.
Cheers
--
Dej
A network connection will be fine in this case. If you have very
dynamic producers and consumers, you may find that advisory messages
propagated across the network use too much bandwidth.
If this is the case, it is possible to specify a static route with
statically included destinations and disable
I have written a multithreaded ODBC program which tries to insert data to 11
tables in MonetDB. Each thread has a connection handle, a statment handle
(comprising of insert into blah!). Each thread on instantiation creates
the handles (connection, statement etc.), connects to the db, binds
met
In fact it's the AMQ2693 bug
Eric-AWL
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/5.3.2-%3A-DemandForwardingBridge-and-Failover-interaction---tp29147602p29147952.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Problem seems to be localized here
When it works Ok :
09:11:02,704 [ActiveMQ Task ] DEBUG AbstractRegion -
localhost removing consumer:
ID:td0sib01s.priv.atos.fr-53632-1279005032084-2:3:2:1 for destination:
queue://FailoverWithOutstandingCommit
2010-07-13 09:11:02,705 [127.0.0
Hi
In 5.3.2,
I try to modify DemandForwardingBridgeSupport class (by adding a
RemoteBrokerNameKnownLatch.countdown at the end of the stop() method).
It's the only source which is modified.
When I launch the maven tests, FailoverConsumerOutstandingCommitTest tests
regularly fail with my version.
25 matches
Mail list logo
