HELP!!!! I need to get my broker working with REST and https

2009-12-15 Thread yesnid
I can't figure this out, I have been chasing this for over a week, I need to get jetty configured handle REST requests for my broker over https. PLEASE HELP! -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/HELP%21%21%21%21-I-need-to-get-my-broker-working-with-REST-and-https-tp26803516

Using JGroups as a transport

2009-12-15 Thread j...@sybase
The doc show that I can use JGroups as a transport for ActiveMQ but I saw a post that says that it is not supported because of licensing issues. When I try to change my connector, I get an exception: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jgroups] If it is not supported, are there plans to? Thanks -

RejectedExecutionException and Message stalled in AMQ 4

2009-12-15 Thread easyl
I am using Geronimo 2.1 with AMQ4. Sometime I got RejectedExecutionException from ActiveMQ TCP Transport, and the AMQ won't continue to process the messages stalled in queues. I don't know if my application lead the problem, I see no Exception from my application server. On http://activemq.apache

Multicast transport actually udptransport for broadcast?

2009-12-15 Thread reccles
I'm new to the project, so forgive me for my ignorance. It appears as though the multicast transport isn't working as expected. I do see messages go from publisher all the way to subscriber but not on the multicast group. I have a pub/sub setup whereby the clients are connecting to a broker usin

Re: ActiveMQ Command Line Tools : the state of Network Connector

2009-12-15 Thread Giant
titexe wrote: > > Hello, > > there's an option in the commandlinetools of ActiveMQ, to know the state > of my network connectors (UP or Down)? > > Because, I want to do monitoring of ActiveMQ and I have a 7 network of > broker, and I want to monitor the state of each network connector. > > T

Re: Q Consumers stop receiving messages

2009-12-15 Thread Rob Davies
could be prefetch limit - the default is 1000 - would be worth trying with 1 On 15 Dec 2009, at 13:54, Diego Castorina wrote: I went a little bit further with my tests: -the queue was containing 5219 messages and no one of them was distributed to any of the listeners (I set the maxConcurr

Re: Q Consumers stop receiving messages

2009-12-15 Thread Diego Castorina
I went a little bit further with my tests: -the queue was containing 5219 messages and no one of them was distributed to any of the listeners (I set the maxConcurrentConsumers property in the DefaultMessageContainerListener of Spring to 20) -I added 50 messages to the queue -the first 50 message o

Re: Q Consumers stop receiving messages

2009-12-15 Thread Diego Castorina
Yes, it is. rajdavies wrote: > > Is this version 5.3 ? > On 15 Dec 2009, at 10:50, Diego Castorina wrote: > >> >> We are experiencing similar problems. >> We are informed by the mbean queueSize property that around 5000 >> messages >> are still in the queue. >> This is the configuration of o

Re: Q Consumers stop receiving messages

2009-12-15 Thread Rob Davies
Is this version 5.3 ? On 15 Dec 2009, at 10:50, Diego Castorina wrote: We are experiencing similar problems. We are informed by the mbean queueSize property that around 5000 messages are still in the queue. This is the configuration of our broker:

Re: low persistent messaging performance using kahadb

2009-12-15 Thread Rob Davies
nice! - thx titexe On 15 Dec 2009, at 09:21, titexe wrote: by putting this config KahaDB, I had the same performance as Kahapersistenceadaptor: titexe titexe wrote: Hello, using kahaDB, could you have the same performance? Because I encounter the same problem, even using what i

Re: Q Consumers stop receiving messages

2009-12-15 Thread Diego Castorina
We are experiencing similar problems. We are informed by the mbean queueSize property that around 5000 messages are still in the queue. This is the configuration of our broker:

Re: low persistent messaging performance using kahadb

2009-12-15 Thread titexe
by putting this config KahaDB, I had the same performance as Kahapersistenceadaptor: titexe titexe wrote: > > Hello, > > using kahaDB, could you have the same performance? > > Because I encounter the same problem, even using what in > ActiveMQ-througthput.xml > > best regards, >