I can't figure this out, I have been chasing this for over a week, I need to
get jetty configured handle REST requests for my broker over https. PLEASE
HELP!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/HELP%21%21%21%21-I-need-to-get-my-broker-working-with-REST-and-https-tp26803516
The doc show that I can use JGroups as a transport for ActiveMQ but I saw a
post that says that it is not supported because of licensing issues. When I
try to change my connector, I get an exception: Transport scheme NOT
recognized: [jgroups]
If it is not supported, are there plans to?
Thanks
-
I am using Geronimo 2.1 with AMQ4. Sometime I got RejectedExecutionException
from ActiveMQ TCP Transport, and the AMQ won't continue to process the
messages stalled in queues.
I don't know if my application lead the problem, I see no Exception from my
application server.
On http://activemq.apache
I'm new to the project, so forgive me for my ignorance.
It appears as though the multicast transport isn't working as expected. I do
see messages go from publisher all the way to subscriber but not on the
multicast group.
I have a pub/sub setup whereby the clients are connecting to a broker usin
titexe wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> there's an option in the commandlinetools of ActiveMQ, to know the state
> of my network connectors (UP or Down)?
>
> Because, I want to do monitoring of ActiveMQ and I have a 7 network of
> broker, and I want to monitor the state of each network connector.
>
> T
could be prefetch limit - the default is 1000 - would be worth trying
with 1
On 15 Dec 2009, at 13:54, Diego Castorina wrote:
I went a little bit further with my tests:
-the queue was containing 5219 messages and no one of them was
distributed
to any of the listeners (I set the maxConcurr
I went a little bit further with my tests:
-the queue was containing 5219 messages and no one of them was distributed
to any of the listeners (I set the maxConcurrentConsumers property in the
DefaultMessageContainerListener of Spring to 20)
-I added 50 messages to the queue
-the first 50 message o
Yes, it is.
rajdavies wrote:
>
> Is this version 5.3 ?
> On 15 Dec 2009, at 10:50, Diego Castorina wrote:
>
>>
>> We are experiencing similar problems.
>> We are informed by the mbean queueSize property that around 5000
>> messages
>> are still in the queue.
>> This is the configuration of o
Is this version 5.3 ?
On 15 Dec 2009, at 10:50, Diego Castorina wrote:
We are experiencing similar problems.
We are informed by the mbean queueSize property that around 5000
messages
are still in the queue.
This is the configuration of our broker:
nice! - thx titexe
On 15 Dec 2009, at 09:21, titexe wrote:
by putting this config KahaDB, I had the same performance as
Kahapersistenceadaptor:
titexe
titexe wrote:
Hello,
using kahaDB, could you have the same performance?
Because I encounter the same problem, even using what i
We are experiencing similar problems.
We are informed by the mbean queueSize property that around 5000 messages
are still in the queue.
This is the configuration of our broker:
by putting this config KahaDB, I had the same performance as
Kahapersistenceadaptor:
titexe
titexe wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> using kahaDB, could you have the same performance?
>
> Because I encounter the same problem, even using what in
> ActiveMQ-througthput.xml
>
> best regards,
>
12 matches
Mail list logo