I think you can use operation system's netstat commond to find it, is that
ok?
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:41 AM, titexe wrote:
>
> I'll change my question, since there's anyone who wants to answer me :(
>
> there's any way in ActiveMQ, to know the state of NetworkConnector ?
>
> Thank you in a
I have a java components set with a 8gb heap size. When it runs out of
memory & tries to GC, it looks like the activemq times out (which I guess is
normal considering the time it takes to run through the heap).
Other actions on the component recover, however, one function that was
stopped when t
This is still very much work in progress - there isn't a hard date set
for it at the moment
On 11 Dec 2009, at 18:26, suedonne123 wrote:
I saw on the new features listing that there is a version 6.0 in
development...
It says this should be released end of 2009...Is there an official
date fo
I saw on the new features listing that there is a version 6.0 in
development...
It says this should be released end of 2009...Is there an official date for
this?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Version-6.0---when-is-release-planned-tp26749234p26749234.html
Sent fr
I'll change my question, since there's anyone who wants to answer me :(
there's any way in ActiveMQ, to know the state of NetworkConnector ?
Thank you in advance;
titexe wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> there's an option in the commandlinetools of ActiveMQ, to know the state
> of my network connectors
Hi,
i've tested kahadb and kahaPersistenceAdapter using same simple test
conditions i.e.
- persistent queue
- 3 consumers
- 1 producer
- 25 kb message size (10 000 msgs)
according this, kahadb has troughput 22 msgs/s while kahaPersistenceAdapter
333 msgs/s. Similar difference observed using ka
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Michal Klimuk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem trying to connect to my broker using JMX. Did some
> research, established a configuration that I need and that should work in
> ActiveMQ 5.3.0 standalone.
>
> My configuration:
> activemq.xml
> http://activemq.apac
2009/12/11 ant elder
> Ok, i'll have to think about that option. Going back to what you said
> earlier about statically configured destinations on the network
> connector, is it right that the static destination only needs to be
> configured at the remote end of the network connector?
yea. a ne
Oh, i also meant to ask about retroactive consumers which i stumbled
across on the website -
http://activemq.apache.org/retroactive-consumer.html. That sounded
useful but with a very quick try it looks like the remote broker needs
to be connected before the topic publish happens, does that sound
ri
Ok, i'll have to think about that option. Going back to what you said
earlier about statically configured destinations on the network
connector, is it right that the static destination only needs to be
configured at the remote end of the network connector? Eg without
changing the put code i tried r
Hi,
I have a problem trying to connect to my broker using JMX. Did some
research, established a configuration that I need and that should work in
ActiveMQ 5.3.0 standalone.
My configuration:
activemq.xml
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
brokerName="localhos" useJmx="true
interesting... this could work but would have some limitations. If you use a
regular consumer, client ack with prefetch=0 and don't ack, by using a
blocking receive(timeout) - the demand will have time to propagate and the
messages will be visible.
However, because the network is store and forward,
sounds like http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html - increase
your q usage limits or decrease the system usage to ensure pending message
references are paged to disk. see also :
http://activemq.apache.org/message-cursors.html
2009/12/11 David Delbecq
> Hello,
>
> we are using an a
Heh, well its probably not a very valid use case of ActiveMQ - I was
toying with using an ActiveMQ broker network for a sort of simple
distributed storage, with clients able to put a message on a queue and
have other clients read the message nondestructively. None of the
other technologies for that
fraid not. What is your use case?
2009/12/11 ant elder
> I see, thanks for the explanation.
>
> The statically configured destination isn't really an option as the
> queue names aren't known till runtime. Are there any other options
> that might help get the messages forwarded irrespective of de
Hello,
we are using an activeMQ server here, as a standalone application and
used by tomcat, which connects to server using tcp:// protocol.
Sometimes, the tomcat client is stalled trying to connect to a queue,
and i have no idea why. Here is a stack dump from tomcat jvm when this
happen
java.
I see, thanks for the explanation.
The statically configured destination isn't really an option as the
queue names aren't known till runtime. Are there any other options
that might help get the messages forwarded irrespective of demand?
...ant
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Gary Tully wro
This is expected. A queue browser takes a shapshot of the queue through a
short lived consumer. The network bridge is by default a demand forwarder,
such that messages are only forwarded when there are consumers on other
brokers.
With the browser, the consumer (and hence demand) is transient, so i
I should have mentioned that this is using ActiveMQ 5.3.0.
...ant
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:11 PM, ant elder wrote:
> I'm trying to track down an problem where a queue browser on a VM
> connection to one AMQ broker is sometimes not seeing messages put on a
> queue from a VM connection to ano
I'm trying to track down an problem where a queue browser on a VM
connection to one AMQ broker is sometimes not seeing messages put on a
queue from a VM connection to another broker in the same network. The
code below can recreate the problem, running the put() on JVM and the
browse() on another JV
Thanks a lot !
Anyone who if this is different in version 5.3 ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Daniel
H. Willstrand wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:08 PM, forda
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>> When activemq creates the tables and such the same tablespace is used for
>> the data even for
>> index
Wonder if it is because the rar file is named "activemq-rar-5.3.0.rar" in
5.3.0.
Enable debug logging to see if there is any further indication of the root
cause and post any errors that you find. This may help diagnose.
2009/12/11 RJtokenlanring
>
> Hi, I have switched to apacheMQ 5.3.
> This
Hi, I have switched to apacheMQ 5.3.
This new error ir raised (that wasn't present before)
[org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionImpl:42] Endpoint failed to process
message. Reason: null
ActiveMq 5.3 + JBoss 4.2.3
This is raised from a MDB:
@MessageDriven(activationConfig ={
@ActivationConfigP
23 matches
Mail list logo
