interesting... this could work but would have some limitations. If you use a
regular consumer, client ack with prefetch=0 and don't ack, by using a
blocking receive(timeout) - the demand will have time to propagate and the
messages will be visible.
However, because the network is store and forward, the message will only be
visible from one broker at a time and following a forward, only from another
broker. Currently the network does not allow forwarding back to an
originator as this can lead to out of control message bouncing.

You will also have to, at some stage, delete the message which may require
locating the broker that currently holds the message.

2009/12/11 ant elder <antel...@apache.org>

> Heh, well its probably not a very valid use case of ActiveMQ - I was
> toying with using an ActiveMQ broker network for a sort of simple
> distributed storage, with clients able to put a message on a queue and
> have other clients read the message nondestructively. None of the
> other technologies for that type of thing that I've looked at seemed
> do quite what i wanted in a simple way with a good license. The
> ActiveMQ network facilities look pretty powerful and easy to use to
> setup a distributed network so it would be perfect if there was a way
> to get the messages replicated to any client.
>
>   ...ant
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > fraid not. What is your use case?
> >
> > 2009/12/11 ant elder <antel...@apache.org>
> >
> >> I see, thanks for the explanation.
> >>
> >> The statically configured destination isn't really an option as the
> >> queue names aren't known till runtime. Are there any other options
> >> that might help get the messages forwarded irrespective of demand?
> >>
> >>   ...ant
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > This is expected. A queue browser takes a shapshot of the queue
> through a
> >> > short lived consumer. The network bridge is by default a demand
> >> forwarder,
> >> > such that messages are only forwarded when there are consumers on
> other
> >> > brokers.
> >> >
> >> > With the browser, the consumer (and hence demand) is transient, so it
> may
> >> > take a snapshot before the forwarding has a chance to kick in. And the
> >> > forwarding stops when the consumer goes away once the browse shapshot
> >> > completes.
> >> >
> >> > One way to make this more deterministic would be to have a statically
> >> > configured destination in the network connector configuration such
> that
> >> > messages for that destination are forwarded irrespective of demand.
> >> >
> >> > 2009/12/11 ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> >> I'm trying to track down an problem where a queue browser on a VM
> >> >> connection to one AMQ broker is sometimes not seeing messages put on
> a
> >> >> queue from a VM connection to another broker in the same network. The
> >> >> code below can recreate the problem, running the put() on JVM and the
> >> >> browse() on another JVM the first QueueBrowser never sees the message
> >> >> but the second QueueBrowser does though sometimes it doesn't without
> >> >> the Thread.sleep for a few seconds.
> >> >>
> >> >> Is there anything obviously wrong with this setup or are there any
> >> >> config settings that could help?
> >> >>
> >> >>   ...ant
> >> >>
> >> >> The code to put a message on a queue:
> >> >>
> >> >>    public void put() throws Exception {
> >> >>        BrokerService broker1 = new BrokerService();
> >> >>        broker1.setBrokerName("default");
> >> >>        broker1.setPersistent(false);
> >> >>        broker1.setUseJmx(false);
> >> >>        TransportConnector tc =
> >> broker1.addConnector("tcp://localhost:0");
> >> >>        tc.setDiscoveryUri(URI.create("multicast://default"));
> >> >>        broker1.addNetworkConnector("multicast://default");
> >> >>        broker1.start();
> >> >>
> >> >>        Connection conn1 = new
> >> >>
> >>
> ActiveMQConnectionFactory("vm://default?create=false").createConnection();
> >> >>        conn1.start();
> >> >>        Session sess1 = conn1.createSession(false, 1);
> >> >>        Queue d1 = sess1.createQueue("d1");
> >> >>        MessageProducer p1 = sess1.createProducer(d1);
> >> >>        TextMessage m1 = sess1.createTextMessage("test");
> >> >>        p1.send(m1);
> >> >>   }
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> The code to browse the messages on the queue:
> >> >>
> >> >>    public void browse() throws Exception {
> >> >>
> >> >>        BrokerService broker2 = new BrokerService();
> >> >>        broker2.setBrokerName("default");
> >> >>        broker2.setPersistent(false);
> >> >>        broker2.setUseJmx(false);
> >> >>        TransportConnector tc =
> >> broker2.addConnector("tcp://localhost:0");
> >> >>        tc.setDiscoveryUri(URI.create("multicast://default"));
> >> >>        broker2.addNetworkConnector("multicast://default");
> >> >>        broker2.start();
> >> >>
> >> >>        Connection conn2 = new
> >> >>
> >>
> ActiveMQConnectionFactory("vm://default?create=false").createConnection();
> >> >>        conn2.start();
> >> >>        Session sess2 = conn2.createSession(false, 1);
> >> >>        Queue d1 = sess2.createQueue("d1");
> >> >>        QueueBrowser b = sess2.createBrowser(d1);
> >> >>
> >> >>        Enumeration x2 = b.getEnumeration();
> >> >>        while (x2.hasMoreElements()) {
> >> >>            System.out.println(x2.nextElement()); // this never gets
> >> >> the message
> >> >>        }
> >> >>
> >> >>        Thread.sleep(5000);
> >> >>
> >> >>        b = sess2.createBrowser(d1);
> >> >>        Enumeration x2a = b.getEnumeration();
> >> >>        while (x2a.hasMoreElements()) {
> >> >>            System.out.println(x2a.nextElement()); // this does get
> the
> >> >> message
> >> >>        }
> >> >>
> >> >>    }
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > http://blog.garytully.com
> >> >
> >> > Open Source Integration
> >> > http://fusesource.com
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://blog.garytully.com
> >
> > Open Source Integration
> > http://fusesource.com
> >
>



-- 
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to