So at work we currently have J2SE processes that use
JMSMessageListeners to consume messages from a Websphere MQ 6.x queue.
At this time I'm enhancing our existing processes to support muliple
JMSMessageListeners where was the original implementation used a
single threaded listener only. ie
Ich werde ab 10.09.2009 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
24.09.2009.
Hi
I am not sure if I am missing something really simple but if I run the below
test case I notice the following exception in my logs. If I change the
rollback to a commit it goes away. Can anyone help with what I am doing
wrong.
public void activeMQTest() throws Exception {
Destination
I have a basic requirement that I am struggling with for the last 3 days.
I want to create a zip file which contains the required Jar files from my
application and the activeMQ jars. I want activeMQ to be embedded into my
JVM.
In order to do this I followed the instructions and created a spring
Hi all,
We're trying to use the Jetty continuations MessageListenerService as
an endpoint for an AJAX app where people get near-realtime updates in
their browser, where each end user subscribes to their own queue of
notifications. (If the user were to leave and then come back, they'd
get another,
I think I already fixed it, unless its broken in other places, I
updated: http://activemq.apache.org/cross-language-clients.html
Regards
Tim.
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 14:21 -0700, Jim Gomes wrote:
> Yes, that file no longer exists. Can you tell me the source page that is
> still linking to that?
Yes, that file no longer exists. Can you tell me the source page that is
still linking to that?
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:47 AM, mjustin wrote:
>
> The C# and .Net link points to http://activemq.apache.org/NMS/index.html
> which gives a 404 error.
> I think it should go to http://activemq.apach
I'm not sure that what you are attempting to do is supported by ActiveMQ.
When you pass in a selector like that, it is essentially a script that is
run at the broker. NMS does not process the selector statement. You'll
need to consult the JMS spec and the ActiveMQ implementation to see if
bitwise
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:40 -0700, sharongi wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I've created 2 c++ classes: one is functioning as the consumer and one as
> the producer.
> I have 2 c++ projects (A and B), both defined as exe. application.
> I wish that one project will function as the consumer and the ot
Hello everyone!
I've created 2 c++ classes: one is functioning as the consumer and one as
the producer.
I have 2 c++ projects (A and B), both defined as exe. application.
I wish that one project will function as the consumer and the other one as
the producer..for that purpose, I added the consume
Note test went from 2009-09-09 14:01:29,918 to about 14:06.
I also needed to kill the broker.
magellings wrote:
>
> Using the wild-card address allowed the producers to connect.
>
> I'm getting a lot of exceptions in the activemq.log however with 5.3 so I
> can't test this. It is very slow t
Using the wild-card address allowed the producers to connect.
I'm getting a lot of exceptions in the activemq.log however with 5.3 so I
can't test this. It is very slow too. I guess this isn't surprising if
exceptions are occurring.
I uploaded the activemq.log and a detailed NMS producer/consu
just fyi: the jira is https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2094
2009/9/9 Gary Tully
> with 5.3 "localhost" is local, not the wildcard address. you may need to
> use the wildcard address "0.0.0.0" if you localhost is tied to a different
> interface.
>
> 2009/9/9 magellings
>
>
>> Okay I
with 5.3 "localhost" is local, not the wildcard address. you may need to use
the wildcard address "0.0.0.0" if you localhost is tied to a different
interface.
2009/9/9 magellings
>
> Okay I have 5.3 configured with the following config. I can't connect from
> another machine through the host na
If i am not wrong, isn't camel-msmq component goes on windows box and is used
for MSMQ to AMQ bridge?
We have a scenario where we have AMQ on Solaris and have a requirement to
forward the messages to MSMQ directly from AMQ. Is there a way to do this?
See my Original post which has details of wha
just as a sanity check - can you try a 5.3 client to connect to the
5.3 broker?
On 9 Sep 2009, at 18:10, magellings wrote:
Okay I have 5.3 configured with the following config. I can't
connect from
another machine through the host name of the server however. This
config is
taken directl
Okay I have 5.3 configured with the following config. I can't connect from
another machine through the host name of the server however. This config is
taken directly from an ActiveMQ 5.2 broker and running that broker I can
connect just fine. Anyone know what's up?
http://www.springframework
The best solution is to use Apache Camel - see http://camel.apache.org/msmq.html
On 9 Sep 2009, at 16:05, vezee wrote:
AMQ experts please HELP!!
Is there a way to configure One way Forward bridge from ActiveMQ
5.20(Solaris/Linux)) to MSMQ(windows)? We want this for our prototype.
If yes, plea
AMQ experts please HELP!!
Is there a way to configure One way Forward bridge from ActiveMQ
5.20(Solaris/Linux)) to MSMQ(windows)? We want this for our prototype.
If yes, please provide some details.
-vezee
vezee wrote:
> Problem statement: Want to create a forward bridge from AMQ to MSMQ. Po
can you validate your usage with the current 5.3-SNAPSHOT, we will be
generating a release candidate from there over the next few days and it
would be good to get completion on this.
2009/9/9 Gary Tully
> think that should be resolved, the broker sees a single XA identifier and
> jboss sees a si
think that should be resolved, the broker sees a single XA identifier and
jboss sees a single XAResource. So long as the completion occurs on only one
of the threads (as it should) it will work.
2009/9/9 andrewsomesyoung
>
>
> Gary Tully wrote:
> >
> > Andy, I think you are experiencing
> > http
You can do that - but each consumer (MessageListener) needs to be
created from a different javax.jms.Session
On 9 Sep 2009, at 14:03, pa7751 wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the information. As suggested by you, ActiveMQ will
ensure that
the same message does not gets picked up by both the consumers.
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> Andy, I think you are experiencing
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2346 which was recently
> resolved on trunk. The ended transaction map allows joined contexts to
> share
> the outcome of a transaction,
>
Gary, not knowing the details behind
https://issue
Hi
Thanks for the information. As suggested by you, ActiveMQ will ensure that
the same message does not gets picked up by both the consumers. But can we
have more than one listeners to the queue like listener1 processes message1
and listener2 processes message2 at the same time. This will improve
Is this what you were looking for:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/4.1.0-incubator/apache-activemq-4.1.0-incubator.tar.gz
It's an older version, latest is 5.2.0.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: cresur [mailto:cre...@gmail.com]
Se
Spoke too soon. I just tried if from my browser and the link is broken. Looking
at your links, which version were you trying to download?
Doug
-Original Message-
From: cresur [mailto:cre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 7:22 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Can
I'm not a Mac person, but have you tried doing it from your browser?
-Original Message-
From: cresur [mailto:cre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 7:22 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Can't download/open ActiveMQ
I'm on a Mac OSX 10.5.8. Following the official
try replacing the & with AND
gtsafas wrote:
>
> I am trying to configure a consumer so it only receives messages that have
> the 2nd bit in the ‘Status’ (user defined INT property) as 0. I came up
> with the following code but I get this Exception…
>
>
>
> “An unhandled exception of type
2009/9/9 pa7751 :
>
> Hi
>
> I have a queue in ActiveMQ messagings server. There are two listeners(on
> different machines), that are listening to the same queue. This is done for
> faster processing of the messages in the queue. Will ActiveMQ ensure that
> the same message is not received by both?
Hi
I have a queue in ActiveMQ messagings server. There are two listeners(on
different machines), that are listening to the same queue. This is done for
faster processing of the messages in the queue. Will ActiveMQ ensure that
the same message is not received by both? Also will it ensure that both
I'm on a Mac OSX 10.5.8. Following the official installation instructions for
Unix…
> wget
> http://activemq.apache.org/path/tofile/apache-activemq-4.1.0-incubator.tar.gz
I get:
> Resolving activemq.apache.org... 140.211.11.130
> Connecting to activemq.apache.org[140.211.11.130]:80... connecte
Andy, I think you are experiencing
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2346 which was recently
resolved on trunk. The ended transaction map allows joined contexts to share
the outcome of a transaction,
2009/9/8 andrewsomesyoung
>
> Neo,
>
> I believe I am struggling with the same probl
32 matches
Mail list logo
