can you validate your usage with the current 5.3-SNAPSHOT, we will be
generating a release candidate from there over the next few days and it
would be good to get completion on this.

2009/9/9 Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>

> think that should be resolved, the broker sees a single XA identifier and
> jboss sees a single XAResource. So long as the completion occurs on only one
> of the threads (as it should) it will work.
>
> 2009/9/9 andrewsomesyoung <ayo...@digitalreefinc.com>
>
>
>>
>> Gary Tully wrote:
>> >
>> > Andy, I think you are experiencing
>> > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2346 which was recently
>> > resolved on trunk. The ended transaction map allows joined contexts to
>> > share
>> > the outcome of a transaction,
>> >
>>
>> Gary, not knowing the details behind
>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2346, it's not as obvious
>> to
>> me that this is the same issue. The problem I am seeing seems pretty
>> straightforward: the JBoss transaction code is sending multiple start
>> messages to the ActiveMQ XAResource, passing a flag of TMJOIN on the
>> second
>> one, as it seems the JTA specification says to do. This behaviour works as
>> designed. The ActiveMQ XAResource delegates the start to its
>> TransactionContext, which very clearly can not handle TMJOIN or TMRESUME
>> flags. (They're commented out in a TODO). The result is both start
>> messages
>> are sent over the wire to the ActiveMQ broker, which passes them on to two
>> separate threads. If the timing is right, the first thread removes the
>> transaction from the TransactionBroker and then the second thread tries to
>> access it resulting in the "XA Transaction ... has not been started"
>> error.
>>
>> If this has been fixed in trunk, then I am excited to hear it.
>>
>> Andy
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/How-to-send-one-message-to-a-topic-in-MDB--tp25325925p25364792.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://blog.garytully.com
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com
>



-- 
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to