activemq with oracle persistence - still looks for derby?

I have activemq configured to run with spring in embedded mode. I also have also added journaling and oracle persistence but activemq still keeps on looking for derby somehow? Derby seems to be optional dependency f

Re: Multiple consumer in exclusive mode does not work.

disable producer flow control : see http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html 2009/7/17 RakeshRay : > > > Down loaded latest 5.3 snapshot today and publisher stops after about 5000 > message and I see these messages in the activemq.log file... Any clue? > 2009-07-17 14:34:13,537 [26.20

Re: How to Embed ActiveMQ browser in JBoss

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:24 AM, MAX222 wrote: > > I have integrated ActiveMQ 5.2.0 with Jboss 4.2.3 and I am able to see > ActiveMQ Queues and Topics in JMX console.I am unable to see the, ActiveMQ > browser when I install it in JBoss. Please tell me step by step procedure > for the same. > > I re

Re: Cannot send any PERSISTENT message?

Yes, I am sure that I am using pooled connection factory. And the enqueue and dequeue counts changes. But the pending messages cannot be consumed. Please note that the problem happens a couple of days or weeks after the initial deployment. And it went away when we restart the broker. Thanks a lo

Re: Multiple consumer in exclusive mode does not work.

Down loaded latest 5.3 snapshot today and publisher stops after about 5000 message and I see these messages in the activemq.log file... Any clue? 2009-07-17 14:34:13,537 [26.206.67:36664] WARN Usage - Memory usage is now at 100% 2009-07-17 14:34:34,654 [iveMQ Scheduler]

Re: Channel was inactive for too long

Excellent work Gary, i'll give it a try and let you know how i get on! I don't think the inactivity timeouts are negotiated, they need to be configured on both ends. Enabling full logging for org.apache.activemq.transport on both brokers will allow you to see the wireFormat parameter negotiation

Re: Multiple consumer in exclusive mode does not work.

2009/7/17 RakeshRay : > > Good to know that it could be fixed in 5.3. > Please help me understand the fix here... > Was the fix made to the broker? If yes then it should not matter what > protocol I use to get the messages out of the queue! > Am I making sense here? > Sure, the changes that I thin

Re: Channel was inactive for too long

I don't think the inactivity timeouts are negotiated, they need to be configured on both ends. Enabling full logging for org.apache.activemq.transport on both brokers will allow you to see the wireFormat parameter negotiations to verify what parameters are being offered and accepted. I think you ma

Re: Multiple consumer in exclusive mode does not work.

Good to know that it could be fixed in 5.3. Please help me understand the fix here... Was the fix made to the broker? If yes then it should not matter what protocol I use to get the messages out of the queue! Am I making sense here? Or if you can point me to the full detail of the problem and th

Re: Changing the ManagmentContext to point to non-localhost

I guess it should be consistent with what TcpTransportServer does when binding to a broker Url. There is an open discussion in http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2094 and I think the upshot of that is to do the minimum interpretation of what is passed in and let the OS resolve the string.

javax.jms.IllegalStateException: The producer is closed

Hi all, I am experiencing the exception “javax.jms.IllegalStateException: The producer is closed” when I try to publish a new message in the queue. I should put in the queue a new message every 10 minutes (or with an even lower frequency ) but after the first one, sometimes after a couple of m

Re: Changing the ManagmentContext to point to non-localhost

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:36 AM, mkonda wrote: > > I think (not just in my case), it should be configurable - defaulting to > localhost. > > One of the issues I have is to connect to the server remotely - to monitor > and manage - which is THE main purpose of JMX. This is not being served if > you

Channel was inactive for too long

Hi We're in the process of implementing two AMQ brokers (v5.2.0) - one in Lille and the other in Hong Kong - in order to exchange data between a set of applications but are hitting a problem. All too frequently the connection is dropped - messages build up as pending on the broker producing them

Re: Changing the ManagmentContext to point to non-localhost

I agree, can you open a jira issue to track this. thanks, 2009/7/17 mkonda : > > I think (not just in my case), it should be configurable - defaulting to > localhost. > > One of the issues I have is to connect to the server remotely - to monitor > and manage - which is THE main purpose of JMX. Thi

How to Embed ActiveMQ browser in JBoss

I have integrated ActiveMQ 5.2.0 with Jboss 4.2.3 and I am able to see ActiveMQ Queues and Topics in JMX console.I am unable to see the, ActiveMQ browser when I install it in JBoss. Please tell me step by step procedure for the same. I referred activemq website for integrating. Thanx. -- View t