Down loaded latest 5.3 snapshot today and publisher stops after about 5000 message and I see these messages in the activemq.log file... Any clue? 2009-07-17 14:34:13,537 [26.206.67:36664] WARN Usage - Memory usage is now at 100% 2009-07-17 14:34:34,654 [iveMQ Scheduler] WARN Usage - Memory usage is now at 100%
Gary Tully wrote: > > 2009/7/17 RakeshRay <rakesh....@proquest.com>: >> >> Good to know that it could be fixed in 5.3. >> Please help me understand the fix here... >> Was the fix made to the broker? If yes then it should not matter what >> protocol I use to get the messages out of the queue! >> Am I making sense here? >> > > Sure, the changes that I think may be relevant are to the broker core > and are transport independent but would all have used openwire test > cases to reproduce. > >> Or if you can point me to the full detail of the problem and the details >> about the fix, that could help me understand better as well. >> > > It is difficult to be exact here but the following query[1] on the > activemq jira (broker fixes to 5.2 with duplicate in the text) will > give you a feel for the changes. > > [1] > http://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&query=duplicate&summary=true&description=true&type=1&pid=10520&fixfor=11914&version=11841&component=10763 > >> Thanks you for your time so far. >> > no problem. > >> >> Gary Tully wrote: >>> >>> Exclusive Consumers is designed to work that way. >>> >>> If you have very high load and message spooling to disk you may be >>> seeing some duplicate message delivery. Some issues around occasional >>> duplicate delivery were addresses on trunk over the past few months. >>> The current 5.3-SNAPSHOT should behave better in this regard with the >>> caveat that Stomp was not a prerequisite for the behavior. >>> If your test scenario does not work as expected with a 5.3-SNAPSHOT >>> please raise a jira issue with a test case so we can attempt to >>> address the issue for the 5.3 release. >>> >>> 2009/7/15 RakeshRay <rakesh....@proquest.com>: >>>> >>>> Starting multiple consumer using Stomp protocol, in exclusive mode >>>> kills >>>> others and just keeps one consumerr alive. >>>> How do I get unique messages using multiple consumers? >>>> >>>> If I turn off exclusive mode, and run multiple consumers they seems to >>>> get >>>> the same message 1% off time. >>>> >>>> Any suggestions are welcomed! >>>> Using active mq 5.2 >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-consumer-in-exclusive-mode-does-not-work.-tp24506735p24506735.html >>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://blog.garytully.com >>> >>> Open Source Integration >>> http://fusesource.com >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-consumer-in-exclusive-mode-does-not-work.-tp24506735p24534850.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > http://blog.garytully.com > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-consumer-in-exclusive-mode-does-not-work.-tp24506735p24539643.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.