Hi.
I am noticing some strange behavior from our activeMQ consumer. The producer
is sending messages to activeMQ throughout the day, and the messages seem to
arrive at the broker. However, the consumer is not notified of these
messages.
2-3 times a day, the consumer is notified and starts proc
Thanks for answering.
But my problem is that the 2 brokers are up and running,
scenario as below:
AB C
broker 1 + -
broker 2
I think you may be experiencing
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2064 - a 5.3-SNAPSHOT could
help
2009/7/2 Champax
>
> Hello,
>
> after several days of testing, i am facing the following issue : I am
> unable
> to limit the physical space of temp storage used by AMQ, and temp_store
Hello,
after several days of testing, i am facing the following issue : I am unable
to limit the physical space of temp storage used by AMQ, and temp_store is
growing ever and ever...
===
= Scenario :
===
- One JVM, handling several producers, spam
If it depends on message number / message size, maybe the broker needs more
buffer space, you can try increasing the memoryLimit in the activemq.xml
file. It helped with a similar problem where the producer stopped after a
small number of messages until I increased the value to 50mb.
This should make 5.3, it is covered by
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1112 which I hope to complete
in the next few days.
2009/7/2 Dan Tran
>
>
> the fix will be in 5.3 perhaps?
>
> -D
>
> rajdavies wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately not in the current release - though using a Queue
> >
the fix will be in 5.3 perhaps?
-D
rajdavies wrote:
>
> Unfortunately not in the current release - though using a Queue
> browser will have the same result - in forcing expired messages to be
> removed
>
> On 15 May 2009, at 08:55, angel7 wrote:
>
>>
>> thank you for your kind
>>
>> So,
I tried with 1000 messsages or 800 byte/each, that is small enough.
I removed can_read before read_frame and seems behaving okay. Reading more
to figure out if can_read is really required in my case or not!
Thanks for the other suggestions, though.
mjustin wrote:
>
> I am using 5.2 and 5.3-Snaps
I am using 5.2 and 5.3-Snapshot. Have you tried to test it with a smaller
number of messages, and without transactions?
RakeshRay wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> We have written a wrapper around and internally it is using using timeout
> feature.
> What version of Active MQ are you using?
>
>
-
-
Hi,
We have written a wrapper around and internally it is using using timeout
feature.
What version of Active MQ are you using?
sub read {
my ($self) = @_;
# after reading, we also need to acknoledge the read, but keep them
both as
part of the same transaction
Hi, Hoover.
We have written a wrapper around and internally it is using
receive_frame()...Here is the wrapper code.
sub read {
my ($self) = @_;
# after reading, we also need to acknoledge the read, but keep them
both as
part of the same transaction
# still need
We're getting the following error on some of our ActiveMQ queues. The queues
will run fine most of the time, and then the queue will corrupt. The
consumer can't process the message and just dies.
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.IOException: Could not read message
ID:localhost-38991-1246487154
I am using oracle as my persistence store. ActiveMQ is running via
activemq-web-console-5.2.0.war which is embedded into JBoss 4.2.2GA on a
linux box.
The config is thus:
Which works.
The only problem is my D
I have nearly the same kind of problem
Did you manage to find the solution ?
JerryShea wrote:
>
> I'm hoping someone will have seen this before. I have built the
> activemq-web-console from source from the apache-activemq-4.1.1
> distribution and am trying to deploy the war to geronimo (2.0.2).
Hi,
I went through the Message Selectors concept available in the
following link:
http://activemq.apache.org/selectors.html
I have doubt regarding the message Selector expression:
I want to know which expressions are supported by the ActiveMQ
Message Selectors . I have
URGENTLY READ http://activemq.apache.org/faq.html
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Gabriel1982 wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> i have a problem of scalability , and i like to use directly a database to
> store messages
>
> i like to ask if there is a configuration so that active mq don't use never
> system
Maybe you meant to call $stomp->receive_frame() in the while loop instead?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:15 PM, RakeshRay wrote:
>
> Just installed Active MQ 5.2.
> Using Stomp, inserted 5000 msgs and try to read the same with
> while ( my $msg = $stomp->read() ) {
>$stomp->commit();
>
I don't know the PHP Stomp client very well (but a Delphi implementation).
$stomp->read() seems to return immediately without waiting for the next
message.
There might be a different method $stomp->read(receivetimeout), which waits
for the given time (in milliseconds) before it gives up.
Michael
18 matches
Mail list logo