ActiveMQ 4.1.3 isn't released - can you move to ActiveMQ 5 ?
On 18 Apr 2008, at 01:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to download ActiveMQ4.1.3. I do not see 4.1.3
on the download page. I see only 4.1.2.
Could someone pl point me to 4.1.3 binaries?
Regards
/Ur
-- Original me
On 18 Apr 2008, at 00:23, tanshul22 wrote:
I have been trying to reduce the overhead an activemq message carries.
ActiveMQTextMessage {commandId = 0, responseRequired = false,
messageId =
null, originalDestination = null, originalTransactionId = null,
producerId =
null, destination = null
On 18 Apr 2008, at 06:26, Aidan wrote:
Hi,
I am using ActiveMQ 5 and am having an issue with my server (running
embedded broker) hitting a deadlock with in
MemoryUsage.waitForMemory. I
have read the JIRA defects for this, however I have a question about
how I
am using Producers in ActiveM
On 17 Apr 2008, at 22:08, Rukus520 wrote:
Hi,
Let's say I'm sending data in the form of xml. The data being sent
is big
but certainly not large enough to warrant the use of BlobMessages.
Which of the following approaches would be better for performance,
and why:
- Send the xml as TextM
Thanks for letting us know it works!
cheers,
Rob
On 17 Apr 2008, at 18:51, yaussy wrote:
Rob,
This looks to have done the trick. I've tested with our
application, which
was hitting the problem every time, and it is fine.
Thanks for your attentiveness to this issue!
Kevin
rajdavies wr
Hi,
I am using ActiveMQ 5 and am having an issue with my server (running
embedded broker) hitting a deadlock with in MemoryUsage.waitForMemory. I
have read the JIRA defects for this, however I have a question about how I
am using Producers in ActiveMQ (the file-system Cursor seems like it would
w
Re compression; if your producer has not set useCompression to true, then the
'compressed' message property will be set to false when viewed by your
consumer. If I'm not mistaken, the default compression algorithm used is
the default “DEFLATE” (gzip) algorithm. More on this algorithm can be found
I need to download ActiveMQ4.1.3. I do not see 4.1.3
on the download page. I see only 4.1.2.
Could someone pl point me to 4.1.3 binaries?
Regards
/Ur
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> It appears that U am running into the following
> problem:
>
It appears that U am running into the following
problem:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1045
Is there any way to increase the pool size while instantiating
AMQ connection factory using Spring?
Regards
/U
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL
I have been trying to reduce the overhead an activemq message carries.
ActiveMQTextMessage {commandId = 0, responseRequired = false, messageId =
null, originalDestination = null, originalTransactionId = null, producerId =
null, destination = null, transactionId = null, expiration = 0, timestamp =
Hi Brian,
For your setup, the AMQ Message store (used by default with AMQ 5+) is
probably your best bet.
The real benefit for JDBC in Active MQ is that it supports a wide range of
platforms that you can utilize if you already have these deployed (reuse
your investment). As well you can handle so
Hi,
Let's say I'm sending data in the form of xml. The data being sent is big
but certainly not large enough to warrant the use of BlobMessages.
Which of the following approaches would be better for performance, and why:
- Send the xml as TextMessages.
- Convert the xml to bytes, and then send t
Rob,
This looks to have done the trick. I've tested with our application, which
was hitting the problem every time, and it is fine.
Thanks for your attentiveness to this issue!
Kevin
rajdavies wrote:
>
> Hopefully!
> On 16 Apr 2008, at 18:39, yaussy wrote:
>
>>
>> Rob,
>>
>> So, I would fi
I have two peers A.xxx.com and B.xxx.com connected using external brokers
running on each.
A and B each have a number of applications that have transport connections to
the
respective brokers.
[clients] <--- tcpConnector ---> [ext Broker A] <=== NetworkConnector ===>
{clients]
The brokers
Hello,
If I look at EJB 2.1 specification, section 18.3.3 it describes behaviour of
container in case the bean listener method throws an exception. Here we
speak about both checked and un-checked exceptions.
Don't you think that it is a bit tough that the whole MDB is killed (does
not receive an
I had the same problem.
I had a filter to acknowledge the receipt of a message installed as a broker
plugin.
Just needed to call super.acknowledge() in my filter where i was overwriting
the acknowledge and now all messages get consumed of the DB.
Yi Huang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am using
I figured it out.
I had an acknowledge filter installed as a brokerPlugin.
needed to call super.acknowledge() to get the messages off the db.
tanshul22 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using AMQ 5.0 with MySQL to persist my messages.
> The messages in my database never get deleted even after they get
>
On 17/04/2008, jimmyfrank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The application would be either a webservice or an .aspx page a user would
> hit. So a user might enter some info on a page with a form and then I'd
> need to create all the activemq resources and send the message. Since it's
> stateles
Hola Luiz,
Since all you want to do is forward messages from broker A to B, then simply
create a forwarding bridge from A to B. Each broker should only have one
transportConnector and broker A would have one networkConnector that will be
used to create the forwarding bridge to B. You really don't
The application would be either a webservice or an .aspx page a user would
hit. So a user might enter some info on a page with a form and then I'd
need to create all the activemq resources and send the message. Since it's
stateless I'd need to be able to have the connections pooled like MSMQ
con
The application would be either a webservice or an .aspx page a user would
hit. So a user might enter some info on a page with a form and then I'd
need to create all the activemq resources and send the message. Since it's
stateless I'd need to be able to have the connections pooled like MSMQ
con
Further to this I'd like to add that the broker shows that all 2
messages have been enqueued and dequeued. So the broker queue has no
messages remaining on it.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Dhruba Bandopadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using spring 2.5.3 mdps, tomcat 6.0.16 and
Hi,
Using spring 2.5.3 mdps, tomcat 6.0.16 and activemq 5.1.0-rc3 with 1
producer, 3 brokers and 1 consumer running 5 threads with almost
default broker configuration.
Producer and consumer connecting via the following url.
failover://(tcp://10.10.32.140:61616,tcp://10.10.32.142:61616,tcp://10.1
Set staticallyIncludedDestinations on the brokerA network
configuration - the properties get copied across and used to create
the network going back from BrokerB when duplex is enabled
cheers,
Rob
On 17 Apr 2008, at 13:13, jimmyfrank wrote:
I don't set up the networkConnectors for Broker
That's very interesting and good to know for me also. Thanks for
making this known Rob.
I assume it is okay to throw checked exceptions in general then from
consumers without any change in jms behaviour?
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Apr 2008
On 17 Apr 2008, at 09:42, srouil wrote:
Hi all,
I have configured Active MQ 5.0.0 integration in JBoss AS 4.0.5
according to
http://activemq.apache.org/integrating-apache-activemq-with-
jboss.html.
I modified also jboss.xml deployment descriptor so that my MDB uses
"Standard Message Infl
I don't set up the networkConnectors for Broker B because as I understand it
since A connects to B and has duplex=true, I don't need to.So I won't
have a place to specify staticallyIncludedDestinations for broker B. Unless
I can do that some other way.
rajdavies wrote:
>
> In which case -
Hi all,
I have configured Active MQ 5.0.0 integration in JBoss AS 4.0.5 according to
http://activemq.apache.org/integrating-apache-activemq-with-jboss.html.
I modified also jboss.xml deployment descriptor so that my MDB uses
"Standard Message Inflow Driven Bean" container configuration and
"mes
Hi.
After spending a little bit time, I created two configuration files to my
ActiveMQ.
My idea is to create two brokers in separated machines, put a message in a
queue in brokerA and get this on brokerB.
Do I in correct way?
Sorry for my poor english.
Thank you in advance.
Luiz Gusta
In which case - I'm guessing you have never registered a consumer on Broker
A?
So you need to set staticallyIncludedDestinations for your network connector
configuration - so that messages get forwarded if a consumer has never
registered on brokerA
see http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-broke
30 matches
Mail list logo
