Re: clarification between 4.2 and 5.0

Rob, Do you have a date for the 5.0 release? cheers Rob Davies wrote: It was decided that because of the need to use JDK 5.0 - version 4.2 should be re-named as 5.0 - so no difference at all ;) On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Jim Alateras wrote: I was just wondering whether the only difference

MapMessage receive

Hi, I have a TopicPublisher publishing a MapMessage or TextMessage in a persistent mode which I can verify using Jconsole. The mapmessage shows the map body intact with all the keyvalue pairs I sent across. On the receiver side I have a durable subscriber which receives the message, however the

active mq broker start up issue.

Hello Active MQ users , We use Tomcat server 5.5.20 with two web applications , namely Webapp A and Web App. B. The inter web app communication is via the active mq broker. The active mq version is 4..0.2 . As of now, the web app A is always started before B. Hence the broker is specified as a

Re: ActiveMQ vs ?

On 7/21/07, Chris Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am starting to work on a project that requires us to Post events from our ERP application. (Mine happens to be in IBM U2 (Unidata) and I have previously posted a message about the best way to communicate. Unfortunatly there is no STOMP interfac

Re: error Platform does not support any of the standard UUID types

After I installed the -devel and -libs RPMs, it worked like a charm. Thanks! Albert Strasheim-2 wrote: > > http://activemq.apache.org/cms/building.html > > Since CentOS is a Red Hat/Fedora derivative, you probably want to install > the e2fsprogs-devel package. > > Cheers, > > Albert > > -

Re: What is the relation between broker and connectionfactory

See these FAQ entries and the linked entries inside them... http://cwiki.apache.org/ACTIVEMQ/what-are-administered-objects.html http://cwiki.apache.org/ACTIVEMQ/how-does-connectionfactory-relate-to-the-broker.html On 7/23/07, Jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jiang wrote: > > From JMS Spec,

Re: error Platform does not support any of the standard UUID types

http://activemq.apache.org/cms/building.html Since CentOS is a Red Hat/Fedora derivative, you probably want to install the e2fsprogs-devel package. Cheers, Albert - Original Message - From: "Tommy O" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 8:05 PM Subject: error Platfo

error Platform does not support any of the standard UUID types

Getting a build error trying to compile on a bare bones CentOS5 system. activemq-cpp-2.0.1]# make ... if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -ansi -pedantic -g -O2 -W -Wall -fstrict-aliasing -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Wno-long-long -MT ActiveMQConnectionFactory.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/ActiveMQConnect

Re: What is the relation between broker and connectionfactory

Hi Jiang, Any reason why you're not using JNDI to configure and access destinations and connection cactories? I'm thinking it would be best to avoid referencing AMQ-specific objects (e.g., ActiveMQConnectionFactory) and let JNDI render the connection factories and destinations for you. It would m

Re: NullPointerException from ActiveMQDestination

I'd recommend that you use a stable release of ActiveMQ. ActiveMQ-CPP is known to with v4.1.1 of the broker which is the latest stable release. There do appear to be some issues with communications with the 5.0-SNAPSHOT broker. On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 02:02 -0700, seamuskerrigan wrote: > I'm runn

Re: What is the relation between broker and connectionfactory

Jiang wrote: > > From JMS Spec, ConnectionFactory and Destination are the objects that > administrator can admin. In activemq destination can be created through > JMX(I have tried). But I don't understand ConnectionFactory very clearly , > in activemq , ConnectionFactory is created through con

Re: NullPointerException from ActiveMQDestination

I'm running on Red Hat Linux 3 and using g++ compiler. Here is the C++ code that I'm running (it's taken from the HelloWorldProducer example from activemq-cpp). The line in bold is causing the NullPointerException in ActiveMQ. cms::Connection* connection; Session* session;