I have checked out the latest version and compiled.
Error is following :
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
D:\99.Tmp\amq.
James:
Whether 'static' schema is not supported also? Last time I tried
'failover', but I find it was slow some way.(I configured 3 brokers , one
was my machine. I run the client code on my machine. I used
'failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,...)' in my opinion it should find
localhost in a shor
This sounds ideal. Can you point me to some docs on how to write a plugin?
Would I be using the same JMX method to delete the destinations in this
plugin?
Thanks!
Jason.
--> Another option is to write a little broker plugin to eagerly delete
any broker-side destinations which are not being
On 7/9/07, happyAMQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to re-create Tibco Rendezvous (RV) semantics, where destinations
(subjects in RV) are not administered objects and don't hang out in the
broker when there aren't any connections using that destination (just like
temporary destinations).
On 7/4/07, Jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James , whether you can make a tar or zip file of activemq document for us
download. (Just as java document or use pdf format) . Sometimes network is
not reliable , it is not convenience at such time.
We're working on it as part of the Camel project;
I'm trying to re-create Tibco Rendezvous (RV) semantics, where destinations
(subjects in RV) are not administered objects and don't hang out in the
broker when there aren't any connections using that destination (just like
temporary destinations). But I need to have specific destination names so
On 7/6/07, happyAMQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to create temporary destinations with a given name, instead
of having ActiveMQ creating a name?
For example,
createTemporaryQueue("My.Chosen.Name");
No. Temporary queues have to be unique to the entire JMS network to a
specifi
Yeah - or use failover...
http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
On 7/9/07, Adrian Co <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Must be out-dated documentation. I don't think list is a valid transport
scheme. You could try the static transport scheme.
Jiang wrote:
> I config 3 brokers .
On 7/9/07, Suchitha Koneru (sukoneru) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The approach which I used for starting active mq broker via Tomcat
server is as follows
1) Include the connection factory for starting the active mq broker in
Tomcat/conf/context.xml as follows
Make sure that activemq.xml
There is this link for vm transport as well
http://activemq.apache.org/vm-transport-reference.html
-Original Message-
From: Suchitha Koneru (sukoneru)
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 12:31 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: RE: Trying to get started: how do I configure Tomcat to run
The approach which I used for starting active mq broker via Tomcat
server is as follows
1) Include the connection factory for starting the active mq broker in
Tomcat/conf/context.xml as follows
Make sure that activemq.xml should be present in the classpath of
Tomca
Hi,
I'm trying to use a simple network of broker s with 2 embedded brokers and
persistent queues. I see lots of the following exceptions:
2007-07-09 09:43:26,498 ERROR
[org.apache.activemq.network.DurableConduitBridge] Failed to add static
destination queue://
secondary.manual
org.apache.activem
Hi,
What does the activemq.log say, on both you master and slave servers ?
With "randomize=false", your client will connect to the servers in the same
order and failover if they don't get a connection.
Not sure if its a bug with failover or the configuration, but the slave
should reject co
Hi,
Im not sure if activemq can be started via tomcat, however I know you can
publish/subscribe to activemq topics/queue over web interface. You need to
copy/link few of the jar files in activemq/lib and activemq/lib/optional to
tomcat's lib folder.
Then in tomcat's conf/web.xml:
1. add contex
After downloading ActiveMQ 4.1.1, I managed to sucessfully run it as
stand-alone.
As a following step, I tried to get Tomcat to start the same process - and
that's where I get lost!
I have tried adding a ConnectionFactory and Queue to the
element, and they do show up on the resource page of
the
I see u are using 4.1.1 and we are using DMX storage(SAN) to persist data and
its very fast.
i see that u mentioned that performance degrades overtime( is it mins or
hours or days?). What is ur throughput rate and how much memory did u
configure for MemoryUsageManager?
naga007 wrote:
>
>
> w
which version of activemq are u using and Can u post ur activemq.xml file?.
Anthrope wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Our application is essentially a pipeline of processing engines that
> communicate via JMS queues, and so far, ActiveMQ has been the JMS
> implementation of our choice. In our applic
Hi,
Did you find a solution to this?
Regards
-Sambit
William Blackburn-2 wrote:
>
> I'm out of my depth - and I apologize for posting this on both lists,
> but I am desperate.
>
> I have configured ActiveMQ in a Master/Slave arrangement according to
> the instructions for 'pure' master
It would be interesting to see if setting the async flag = false
makes a difference on the vm:// transport:
e.g. factory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory("vm://localhost?
broker.persistent=false,async=false");
cheers,
Rob
On Jul 3, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Elliotte Harold wrote:
I have a bunch of
19 matches
Mail list logo
