Hi, What does the activemq.log say, on both you master and slave servers ?
With "randomize=false", your client will connect to the servers in the same order and failover if they don't get a connection. Not sure if its a bug with failover or the configuration, but the slave should reject connection. Maybe you should be connecting to the master server first and then failover to the slave. - Sandeep Gilbert wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently I am running a setup with a pure Master/Slave configuration. > According to the documentation, the slave broker should not accept any > connections when it is a slave. So I configure my client with the > following connection url: > failover://(tcp://slavehost:61616,tcp://masterhost:61615)?randomize=false > > My assumption is wrong as my client is able to connect to the slave and > all the messages produced are put in the slave's queue. However my > consumer is not able to retrieve the messages from the slave's queue. > > Can anyone advise on whether this is the correct behaviour? > Should the slave broker be accepting connections? > Thanks. > > Regards, > Gilbert > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Slave-broker-still-accepts-connections-from-MessageProducer-tf4046999s2354.html#a11504554 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
