On 2010-10-05 22:31, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:23:19AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> H, can you please give a shot at the following one? Thank you.
>
> I applied this patch on top of stock 2.6.35.5 as usual (no other patches)
> and tested on my maverick image as before. I r
Hi,
I am trying to measure how many UML objects can run on a PC.
I guessed that the number depends on tmpfs mounted on /dev/shm.
# My hosts provide two tmpfs, mounted on /dev/shm and /lib/init/rw.
My experience was the follows.
1. Run many UML at once on my PC.
2. Some UML crushed, and the UML du
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:58:16AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> So how about this? Note that I haven't even compiled this. The request
> handling logic really should be fixed in there, it's horribly
> inefficient.
Thanks. I fixed the compile error with:
> + .rq_offset 0, \
to
>
