Richard Andrews wrote:
> Which uml guest kernels should be used with which filesystem images (does it
> matter)?
> I'm asking because I assume that more recent distros will make use of kernel
> features which are not present in older kernels.
>
Recent distros (except slackware) may not work with
--- Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recent distros (except slackware) may not work with 2.4 (udev/devfs/etc)
> but apart from that any recent 2.6 kernel should do (bearing in mind
> that few bugfixes are backported (except for 2.6.16).
I was thinking more in terms of features added
Hi. I have a configuration for simulating a network which seems to be
triggering a bug somewhere.
The UML is configured with three adapters, which are connected to three
separate uml_switch daemons. One is for a management interface (eth0).
The other two (eth1, eth2) are configured in a bridge.
Richard Andrews wrote:
> --- Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Recent distros (except slackware) may not work with 2.4 (udev/devfs/etc)
>> but apart from that any recent 2.6 kernel should do (bearing in mind
>> that few bugfixes are backported (except for 2.6.16).
>>
>
> I wa
Hello,
I've got this error while compiling:
arch/um/sys-i386/../../i386/kernel/module.c: In function 'apply_relocate':
arch/um/sys-i386/../../i386/kernel/module.c:137: error:
'__KERNEL_TEXT_OFFSET' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/um/sys-i386/../../i386/kernel/module.c:137: error: (E
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 08:25:25PM +0100, kototama kototama wrote:
> arch/um/sys-i386/../../i386/kernel/module.c: In function 'apply_relocate':
> arch/um/sys-i386/../../i386/kernel/module.c:137: error:
> '__KERNEL_TEXT_OFFSET' undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/um/sys-i386/../../i386/ke
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:26:50AM +1000, Richard Andrews wrote:
> Which uml guest kernels should be used with which filesystem images (does it
> matter)?
>
> I'm asking because I assume that more recent distros will make use of kernel
> features which are not present in older kernels.
You don't
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 03:32:27PM +0100, Nick Dyer wrote:
> BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
I just tried all that (and I don't get the "br0: ..." messages) with
no problems.
> Attaching gdb to the main kernel thread (if I am understanding which one
> that is correctly) suggests that the hun
Can you try 2.6.20 from kernel.org? Looks like a Ubuntu kernel patch is
breaking UML.
Yes it was an old grsecurity patch that I totally forgot. Sorry for the
question; it works fine without.
Thanks again.
-
This SF.net e
