On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:06:00PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Normally a forkbomb exhausts CPU faster than memory (because there is also
> swap configured). With 32M or 64M of RAM and swap disabled, I get multiple
> OOM.
This might be better now with the irqstacks patchset I sent in. This
was
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 04:52:51AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> This might be better now with the irqstacks patchset I sent in. This
> was prompted by this problem (forks failing when there is free memory
> - just not enough contiguous to get a kernel stack).
Hmmm, I still get ooms from fork(), even
