On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:06:00PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Normally a forkbomb exhausts CPU faster than memory (because there is also
> swap configured). With 32M or 64M of RAM and swap disabled, I get multiple
> OOM.
This might be better now with the irqstacks patchset I sent in. This
was prompted by this problem (forks failing when there is free memory
- just not enough contiguous to get a kernel stack).
> > Is this some real bug or just as result of the forkbomb?
> This is a warning I haven't had the time to investigate over.
I haven't looked yet either, but it seems like a real bug.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
