On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:57:34PM -0500, Nithin B R wrote:
hi All,
> I am trying to bring up networking on my UML. I am using the root
> filesytem provided here:
> http://www.coherenthosting.com/prj/uml/henrique/pool_h01/fs_deb3B_2.ex2.bz2
>
> When I boot my vmlinux, it gives out this error messa
Hello,
I've found two compilation problems with UML (both are present in
2.6.16-rc4 kernels). The problem is with processor type selection.
1) If I select processor type i386 the compilation fails with:
CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/asm/atomic.h:9,
Hello,
I have the following problem with UML in 2.6.16-rc4:
if I configure the kernel to use tracing thread support, then the kernel
stops just after mounting the root and then writing:
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDSIGACCEPT called
If I set init to be e.g. /bin/bash and not /sbin/init, then I g
On Saturday 18 February 2006 8:54 am, Markus Moeller wrote:
> I have a UML system running on Suse SLES9. After patching the host system
> the UML system starts up, but I cannot login because of a misconfigured
> pam.conf (It needs a running network for authentication and the network
> adapter fail
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:22:35PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> I have the following problem with UML in 2.6.16-rc4:
> if I configure the kernel to use tracing thread support, then the kernel
> stops just after mounting the root and then writing:
>
> line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDSIGACCEPT called
>
> I
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:22:35PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > I have the following problem with UML in 2.6.16-rc4:
> > if I configure the kernel to use tracing thread support, then the kernel
> > stops just after mounting the root and then writing:
> >
> > line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDSIGACCEPT c
Talking about 32-bit UMLs on AMD64 hosts: I've just discovered that on a
x86_64 platform you can use at least partially the SKAS3 patch.
Instead of adding "skas0" to the command line, to get a running UML it
suffices to use "noprocmm", if it's accepted by UML (I don't remember when
the patch wa
On Sunday 19 February 2006 23:04, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Friday 17 February 2006 1:48 pm, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Friday 17 February 2006 16:44, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 03:05:28PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > > > For the future packaging: I do believe that Debian's defa
Yes I had a swap and / filesystem and got the fdisk the right offset to
mount the / filesystem.
Thanks
Markus
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Landley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: "Markus Moeller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [uml-user] A
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 06:34:49PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Actually I was not probably clear enough. In this case starting UML
> fails even before it writes out anything (and as I checked the same
> problem is with 2.6.15 kernel) - it actually fails during the
> dynamic-linking phase (outputs of
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 06:34:49PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Actually I was not probably clear enough. In this case starting UML
> > fails even before it writes out anything (and as I checked the same
> > problem is with 2.6.15 kernel) - it actually fails during the
> > dynamic-linking phase (
first, thank you for replying.
i have ran downloaded kernel from uml site and they booted fine.
i am using root_fs downloaded from uml site.
this is what i am getting when i boot linux-2.6.12 with
stderr=1 and complining with default config ( make defconfig ) as
you descrribed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:34:52PM +0200, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote:
> Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...<0>Kernel panic
> - not sync ing: Segfault with no mm
Is there some reason you have to use 2.6.12? You'd get more help if
you can make this happen on 2.6.15 or later.
I want to build a UML cluster, to provide a homogeneous cluster across
a series of heterogeneous machines. And I only have root access on a
single box in this set of machines. I can't even get UML installed as
a root user on all but this one box, so forget about installing
uml_net and friends sit
I've decided to get my act together. Last week I finally debugged (as I
reported) the COW problem on 64-bit platform and this week I've finally
released the whole thing.
It's on my homepage, _now_ (I had forgot to add the link) - the archives are
at this URL (a different one than for patches):
Excellent, the difference in speed is noticeable. no benchmarks yet, but
the load on the host seems lower.
Any idea what this is:
Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode fault at addr 0x0, ip 0x4b20
deactivate_all_fds failed, errno = 9
It is 100% reproducible on a slackware10 filesystem runnin
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 05:08:01PM -0500, Benjamin Rutt wrote:
> I want to build a UML cluster, to provide a homogeneous cluster across
> a series of heterogeneous machines. And I only have root access on a
> single box in this set of machines. I can't even get UML installed as
> a root user on a
actually i have done a while ago and it passes the boot .
yet i fear that i have to create a new root_fs since it fails
while trying to mount it.
does anyone has a pointer to root_fs for linux-2.6.15 .
On 2/20/06, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:34:52PM +0200, Raz
18 matches
Mail list logo
