Hi everybody,
I've just setup a test environment for OpenWBEM: A Host Machine running
2.6.14.2 with two virtual UML-Machines running 2.6.14.2 as well,
SKAS3-patch is enabled. I decided to use Debian as distribution on all
machines.
I've just compiled OpenWBEM but when executing owcimomd as ro
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 05:43:38PM +0100, Joel Palmius wrote:
> What more?
Disable CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP until we figure out what's happening.
Jeff
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you gr
Hi,
first of all: thanks to Blaisorblade for the answer to my (stupid)
devfs/device question some days ago. You're great!
I'm experimenting more with UML and I'm quite lucky about it, I just came
across severeal questions I'm really stuck with:
First of all, I'ld like to improve swap performance
Chris wrote:
>Blaisorblade wrote:
>
>>Yep, this crash wasn't described in your original mail, so please add all
>>details about the compilation environment, the host kernel, the hardware and
>>the scenario triggering the host crash (if any).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>here we go:
>
>Portage 2.0.51.
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:42:31 +0100
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Opening a file on hostfs consumes a fd (not permanently - just as
> long as the file is open in the guest), so the kernel crashes as soon
> as it opens a file (in SKAS3 mode, once per fork()/exec() at least).
You are rig
On Friday 25 November 2005 19:52, Jesús García Crespo wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:42:31 +0100
> Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Opening a file on hostfs consumes a fd (not permanently - just as
> > long as the file is open in the guest), so the kernel crashes as soon
> > as it open
On Friday 25 November 2005 09:56, Christoph Bouvier wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> And this is what my syslog says:
> Nov 25 07:46:38 umlmaster kernel: line_write_room: tty1: no room left in
> buffer
> I don't exactly know what this message means but I suspect that it has
> something to do with the UM
Antoine, I'm CC:ing you about your UML SELinux policy - see below for context.
On Friday 25 November 2005 13:12, Chris wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> >Blaisorblade wrote:
> >>Yep, this crash wasn't described in your original mail, so please add all
> >>details about the compilation environment, the host
On Friday 25 November 2005 12:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all: thanks to Blaisorblade for the answer to my (stupid)
> devfs/device question some days ago. You're great!
> I'm experimenting more with UML and I'm quite lucky about it, I just came
> across severeal questions I'm r
>Let me think - you refer to the SKAS3 patch merged with grsec?
>
>
>
No, i was not able to apply both, skas and grsec, so i used
gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r10 patched with skas3, no grsec.
>I looked into this time ago on request, after somebody posted a merge, but I
>deadlocked on a problem for c
On Saturday 26 November 2005 01:41, Chris wrote:
> >Let me think - you refer to the SKAS3 patch merged with grsec?
> >You have a
> >
> >*) 2.6.12 (the bug could have been fixed)
> >
> >
> >*) with SKAS (it may be at fault)
>
> too insecure, so isn't really an option
I talk about the SKAS patch on
Blaisorblade wrote:
>On Saturday 26 November 2005 01:41, Chris wrote:
>
>
>>>Let me think - you refer to the SKAS3 patch merged with grsec?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>>You have a
>>>
>>>*) 2.6.12 (the bug could have been fixed)
>>>
>>>
>>>*) with SKAS (it may be at fault)
>>>
>>>
>>too inse
12 matches
Mail list logo
