Hi, I have couple of questions about compiling a new UML-kernel.
I loaded linux-2.6.9.tar.gz and uncompressed it to /uml/ -folder (so
there are /uml/linux-2.6.9/ -folder.
No patches are applied yet.
I loaded uml-2.6.9-bs7.patch.bz2 to /uml/linux-2.6.9/ -folder and
applied it in the same folder:
Hi.
More info about my problem.
I haven't put new root filesystem yet. I have downloaded necessary
files from http://www.stearns.org/uml-root/ but not yet installad
them. Is new root filesystem needed before compiling UML kernel?
-Teemu Väisänen
2005/8/11, Väisänen Teemu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
Now I'm a UML newbie too, so please correct me if I'm wrong...
Väisänen Teemu wrote:
I haven't put new root filesystem yet. I have downloaded necessary
files from http://www.stearns.org/uml-root/ but not yet installad
them. Is new root filesystem needed before compiling UML kernel?
No,
Thanks Mikael!
This is still a problem:
> >>Problem is, that if I save .config -file in menuconfig/xconfig etc.,
> >>lines which caused errors before, disappear. Without ARCH=um
> >>-parameter they work fine.
>
> I _think_ that's because en uml guest kernel doesn't use those symbols
> in the ker
Hi.
I am trying to start UML.
I have Fedora Core 3 and 2.6.9-1.667 -kernel installed.
I have followed
http://www.stearns.org/uml-root/root_fs.fc-3-base.pristine.20050605.note
instructions,
I downloaded root filesystem for FC3:
root_fs.fc-3-base.pristine.20050605.bz2
from
http://www.stearns.org
Hello,
i am also seeing similar problem.
my host kernel is 2.6.9-1.667
i downloaded the kernel version 2.6.12.3 from
kernel.org and built it for ARCH=um after enabling
virtual block devices.
Then i used the root_fs_toms1.7.205.bz2 filesystem
guest file from
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.ne
Hi,
I am on Ubuntu 5.04 (kernel 2.6.10). I have downloaded the 2.6.10 kernel from
kernel.org and did the following:
Hi, here is my UML starting log:
# ./linux26 mem=160M ubd0=cow,root_fs.2005060501 ubd1=swap
root=/dev/ubd/0 con=pty con0=fd:0,fd:1
Checking for the skas3 patch in the host...not found
Checking for /proc/mm...not found
Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /tmp...OK
Linux version 2.6.10-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED
On 8/10/05, Nelson Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [ oops ]
> >
> > * The "tar" command failed with error:
> >
> > rd/c6d27p4: Cannot mknod: No space left on device
> > tar: rd/c6d27p5: Cannot mknod: No space left on device
> > tar: rd/c6d27p6: Cannot mknod: No space left on device
> > tar
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:45:20PM +, Marco Garcs wrote:
> No, the root_fs has enough space i know 4 sure! :( any more
> ideas?
Could the filesystem have run out of inodes? Use `df -i' to check.
--
Ruaidhri
---
SF.Net email is Spon
Right, recompile the guest.
If and when you get to recompiling the host, note that the UML patch and the
SKAS patch cannot coincide on a kernel, so you need to patch another vanilla
kernel with the SKAS patch.
To keep it straight:
Guest
- Kernel with UML patch (preferably a "bs" version - for "Bl
I had a similar problem.
Here's how I fixed it:
1) Boot your UML with this option added on the command line: init=/bin/sh
2) That should allow you to poke around in /dev. Check for terminals (eg.
tty0, tty1, tty/0, tty/1).
3) If there are none, and if you are using DevFS - which I suspect you are
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ruaidhri Power <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 11, 2005 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [uml-user] booting
To: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:45:20PM +, Marco Garcs wrote:
> No, the root_fs has enough space i know 4
I'm trying to restrict the access for hostfs. When starting the
uml-kernel with the option "hostfs=/some/directory" I can mount this
directory with the command "mount none /mnt/host -t hostfs". But I am
still able to mount the hosts "/" with the command "mount none /mnt/host
-t hostfs -o /"
I thoug
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:02:44PM +, Marco Garcs wrote:
> Nope.. left the root_fs mounted on loop, and did a watch "df -i", and
> this is what i see:
>
> /uml/root_fs 0 0 0- /uml/loop
Are you sure you're mounting the filesystem correctly? This is how I do
it o
Hi,
I'm taking a look at UML for the first time and I'm wondering about a few
things. Would be great to hear some experiences.
- SKAS / TT
Is SKAS really worth the trouble? I mean is the performance better? Or are
there other issues why one should use SKAS Mode?
- Opteron Support
I shall setu
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ruaidhri Power <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 11, 2005 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [uml-user] booting
To: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:02:44PM +, Marco Garcs wrote:
> Nope.. left the root_fs mounted on loop, a
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 05:52:39PM +, Marco Garces wrote:
> How exactly do i use static device nodes instead of udev? sorry.. but
> im a newbie on this
I'd suggest you do three things:
First, try another guest image to make sure that works - particularly if
it might fulfill your needs. T
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, eric leitner wondered:
> - SKAS / TT
> Is SKAS really worth the trouble? I mean is the performance better? Or
> are there other issues why one should use SKAS Mode?
Drastically better performance, easier debuggability, lower load on the
host, better security. Use it unless you
Hi,
I tried to compile the guest kernel using linux-2.6.12.3 (from
kernel.org) and the patch: uml-2.6.12-bb10-skas0.patch.bz2
but all I got were the following errors:
-- snip --
arch/um/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x78da): In function `linux_main':
arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c:352: undefined reference
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:25:12PM +0100, Ajitabh Pandey wrote:
> I am on Ubuntu 5.04 (kernel 2.6.10). I have downloaded the 2.6.10 kernel from
>
> kernel.org and did the following:
>
I would try something newer. 2.6.10 is fairly old at this poin
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:13:32AM +0300, V?is?nen Teemu wrote:
> And there are REALLY MANY problems/errors, like
> ...
> /boot/config-2.6.9-1.667:2243: trying to assign nonexisting symbol
> USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_USA19W
make mrproper
make mrproper ARCH=um
cp arch/um/defconfig .config
then do your c
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:17:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - Opteron Support
> I shall setup several services on a Dual Opteron 250. I came across some
> issues with Opterons and I wonder if Opterons are ok for UML? Are they
> stable? Or ist this a problem with 64 Bit Mode only and UML
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:12:20PM +0300, V?is?nen Teemu wrote:
> # ./linux26 mem=160M ubd0=cow,root_fs.2005060501 ubd1=swap
> root=/dev/ubd/0 con=pty con0=fd:0,fd:1
>
> It seems to start, altought there seems to be at least one problem:
> ...
> Starting udev: MAKEDEV: error making /dev/cpu/0/mi
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:45:20PM +, Marco Garc?s wrote:
> No, the root_fs has enough space i know 4 sure! :( any more ideas?
A sparse root_fs with no space left on the host filesystem?
Jeff
---
SF.Net
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 05:04:46PM +0200, uml wrote:
> I'm trying to restrict the access for hostfs. When starting the
> uml-kernel with the option "hostfs=/some/directory" I can mount this
> directory with the command "mount none /mnt/host -t hostfs". But I am
> still able to mount the hosts "/" w
Ernie , your mail was helpful , with the help of your
mail and some help from Jeff Dike at IRC , i got past
this issue , till the point where now i come to the
login prompt but then after giving the correct user
name and password , it gives the error of "ile: unable
to allocate pty/tty pair" see de
Hi and thank you for help!
2005/8/12, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:12:20PM +0300, V?is?nen Teemu wrote:
> > After many messages it goes to login -screen, but after that or in that it
> > says:
> >
> > INIT: Id "4" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
>
> Wha
28 matches
Mail list logo
