Sorry,
Forget to reply also to list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marcio Scheibler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16/05/2005 09:49
Subject: Re: [uml-user] six UBD devices barrier at startup ??
To: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I use host logical volumes (LVM) as UBD device
On 5/15/05, Gianni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I can't setup quota in UML.
> I get the following error :
>
> -bash-2.05b# /sbin/quotaon -a
> quotaon: using //aquota.group on /dev/ubd/0 [/]: No such process
> quotaon: Quota format not supported in kernel.
When I set up quotas in a UML, I h
hi!
I have a question regarding applying a uml patch. Can i apply a uml
2.6.0-test9 patch to a linux 2.6.8.1-4 kernel? should the uml patch
version and kernel version be the same always??
Thanks,
Ashwin
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Or
On Monday 16 May 2005 19:04, Ashwin Kumar Tanugula wrote:
> hi!
> I have a question regarding applying a uml patch. Can i apply a uml
> 2.6.0-test9 patch to a linux 2.6.8.1-4 kernel?
No, I can bet it won't compile without testing. Why don't you use the 2.6.8.1
patch, or even a later kernel?
Also,
On Monday 16 May 2005 15:14, Marcio Scheibler wrote:
> Sorry,
> Forget to reply also to list...
> Hi,
>
> I use host logical volumes (LVM) as UBD devices in UML.
> UML's user at host owns volumes nodes at host's /dev.
> I'd like to stress that once running and after I add ubd6 with
> uml_mconsole
> Kernel command line: uml_dir=/var/run/uml mem=128m devfs=nomount
> con0=null,fd:1 con=pts root=/dev/ubda
> initrd=/var/local/initrd/uml-jfs-2.6.10.initrd
> ramdisk_size=16384 ubd0s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_root
> ubd1s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_var ubd2s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_usr
> ubd3s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_ho
On Monday 16 May 2005 20:11, Wim Bonis wrote:
> > Kernel command line: uml_dir=/var/run/uml mem=128m devfs=nomount
> > con0=null,fd:1 con=pts root=/dev/ubda
> > initrd=/var/local/initrd/uml-jfs-2.6.10.initrd
> > ramdisk_size=16384 ubd0s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_root
> > ubd1s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_var ubd2s
Comments below...
2005/5/16, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Kernel command line: uml_dir=/var/run/uml mem=128m devfs=nomount
> > con0=null,fd:1 con=pts root=/dev/ubda
> > initrd=/var/local/initrd/uml-jfs-2.6.10.initrd ramdisk_size=16384
> > ubd0s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_root ubd1s=/dev/vg01/
Aaargh
"The same old thing happens every new day..."
How many time has this list seen this mistake before ?
Sorry... sorry... sorry... sorry
... and many, many, many Thanks.
2005/5/16, Wim Bonis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Kernel command line: uml_dir=/var/run/uml mem=128m devfs=nomount
>
FC3 works fine as guest ?
Itamar Reis Peixoto
+55 (34) 3238 3845
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://vps.ispbrasil.com.br --->>> servidores linux
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: May 12, 2005 5:16:38 PM
A: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Ogg: [uml-user] easiest distro to get UML running on
Sorry for sounding like a total newbie, but I'm doing a presentation on
UML tonight for my LUG group, and while I have it r
On Tue, 17 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled:
> On Saturday 14 May 2005 14:00, Nix wrote:
>> At any rate, specifying the paths explicitly won't do any harm
>> anywhere. :)
> On 2.6 we just removed -L/usr/lib from the linker command line because of
> some warnings.
EXPN? (Are they serious? What
On Saturday 14 May 2005 14:00, Nix wrote:
> On Sat, 14 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] prattled cheerily:
> > On Saturday 14 May 2005 13:00, Nix wrote:
> >> On Sat, 14 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whispered secretively:
> >> > On Saturday 14 May 2005 02:00, Nix wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, 14 May 2005, [EMAIL
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 01:17, Nix wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled:
> > On Saturday 14 May 2005 14:00, Nix wrote:
> >> At any rate, specifying the paths explicitly won't do any harm
> >> anywhere. :)
> >
> > On 2.6 we just removed -L/usr/lib from the linker command line becau
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 01:46, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Also, about TLS and such: do you know where I can download the userspace
> example code?
Here I refer to futexes, sorry.
> I'd like to use some kind of semaphores in UML for
> cooperation between host threads. Currently it suspends by read/writi
On Monday 16 May 2005 20:27, Marcio Scheibler wrote:
> Comments below...
Read the typo message?
> In future maybe I'll try later kernels and other ways to get more volumes,
> UBD partitions, nested LVM, etc...
> For while thanks for all assistence.
>
> > > VFS: Mounted root (cramfs filesystem) rea
... commenting on bits and pieces of this thread...
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:17:38AM +0100, Nix wrote:
> eee-ick. That'll really collide nastily with glibc's assumption that
> errno is located in thread-local storage, I fear.
It's sort of necessary (or some nasty trick is) because UML (re)maps
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 03:01, Jeff Dike wrote:
> ... commenting on bits and pieces of this thread...
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:17:38AM +0100, Nix wrote:
> > eee-ick. That'll really collide nastily with glibc's assumption that
> > errno is located in thread-local storage, I fear.
>
> It's sort
On Tue, 17 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggested tentatively:
> On Tue, 17 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled:
>>So, we could conditionalize that (maybe -D_SEARCH_PATH=). I'm
>> not going to merge it in this form, so send me the cleaned up version.
>
> If I could work out what to
19 matches
Mail list logo
