Re,
The configuration between my own host computer and my virtual filesystem
is the same.
Here my file "/etc/inittab" :
---
# The default runlevel.
id:2:initdefault:
# Boot-time system configuration/initialization script.
# This is run first except when booting in emergency (-b) mode.
si::sys
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Primeroz wrote:
Hi all ML.
What is four you the best way to do a Point to Point connection beetween 2
UML Machine?
Until now i've done this by creating a BRIDGE virtual interface on Host
machine and then connecting the tun device associated to each of the UML
Machine to the
Hi all ML.
What is four you the best way to do a Point to Point connection beetween
2 UML Machine?
Until now i've done this by creating a BRIDGE virtual interface on Host
machine and then connecting the tun device associated to each of the UML
Machine to the same bridge.
I'm starting to not lik
Hi all,
Just thought I'd let you know that Blaisorblade's patches for 2.4 apply
cleanly to 2.4.29, but compilation fails shortly on my dev box (looks
like some missing headers). What do i need to do?
Cheers
Antoine
---
This SF.Net email is sp
Hi all,
I was having some very unusual problems with 2.6.9-bs5 and -bb4 running
on an AMD 64 2.6.10-as1 host (2.6.10 + minimal security fixes): some
processes would not start with the correct SELinux context (sshd would
run in kernel_t instead of sshd_t for no apparent reason) but 2.6.10
vanilla a
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 20:33 +, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just thought I'd let you know that Blaisorblade's patches for 2.4 apply
> cleanly to 2.4.29, but compilation fails shortly on my dev box (looks
> like some missing headers). What do i need to do?
>
> Cheers
> Antoine
Oops, for
On Sunday 16 January 2005 11:57, Mark Huth wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am encountering a problem when I access the host filesystem
> >> via hostfs and the directory has a lot of entries. For
> >> example when I type in 'ls /mnt/host/usr/lib' uml just freezes
> >> and I have to ctrl-c to get back t
On Saturday 15 January 2005 18:32, Jason Clark wrote:
> In case anyone is interested, here is the cpucap and cpuutil patches I was
> talking about. They apply, but Im really not sure about the behaviour
> and dont have the ability to test on a 2.6.6 kernel until Monday.
>
> BTW, this is the first
Thank you very much for the suggestions! I was wondering if the order and
numbering mattered, now I know. :-) I'll retweak and repost.
Jason
The place where you made your stand never mattered.
Only that you were there... And still on your feet.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
On
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 09:52, Romain DAUMONT wrote:
> Re,
>
> The configuration between my own host computer and my virtual filesystem
> is the same.
But you are using DevFS on your guest and don't have updated /etc/inittab (and
possibly /etc/securetty and so on) to use the DevFS console nam
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 21:37, Antoine Martin wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 20:33 +, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just thought I'd let you know that Blaisorblade's patches for 2.4 apply
> > cleanly to 2.4.29, but compilation fails shortly on my dev box (looks
> > like some mi
I'm trying to build a 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 UML kernel for both guest and
host. I downloaded some older pre-built UML kernels, and those work
on the 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 host, by work I mean they don't segfault
immediately. When I attempt to build the UML kernel from source and
run it, I get an immediate segf
I'm trying to build a 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 UML kernel for both guest and
host. I downloaded some older pre-built UML kernels, and those work
on the 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 host, by work I mean they don't segfault
immediately. When I attempt to build the UML kernel from source and
run it, I get an immediate segf
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 21:33, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was having some very unusual problems with 2.6.9-bs5 and -bb4 running
> on an AMD 64 2.6.10-as1 host (2.6.10 + minimal security fixes):
Yes, I'm seeing it discussed onto kerneltrap.org...
> some
> processes would not start w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> When I attempt to build the UML kernel from source and run it, I get
> an immediate segfault.
Can you gdb or strace it and see where it's dying?
Any patches on the host we should know about, like exec-shield or grsecurity?
Jeff
---
There are no patches that I can think of. If it's any help, I'm
running gentoo. I'm listing the output of gcc and libc in case my
configuration of them might be a problem.
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.4 20040623 (Gentoo Hardened Linux 3.3.4-r1, ssp-3.3.2-2,
pie-8.7.6)
/lib/libc.so.6
Available e
16 matches
Mail list logo
