Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>> Jeff Dike wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:51:38AM +0200, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
Random patches are still in place. I'm wondering why this does not work...
Jeff, any idea ?
>>> Is it dumping messages about not being able to ge
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Jeff Dike wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:51:38AM +0200, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
>>> Random patches are still in place. I'm wondering why this does not work...
>>> Jeff, any idea ?
>> Is it dumping messages about not being able to get enough entropy?
>>
>> If you s
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:51:38AM +0200, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
>> Random patches are still in place. I'm wondering why this does not work...
>> Jeff, any idea ?
>
> Is it dumping messages about not being able to get enough entropy?
>
> If you strace UML on the host, do you
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:51:38AM +0200, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> Random patches are still in place. I'm wondering why this does not work...
> Jeff, any idea ?
Is it dumping messages about not being able to get enough entropy?
If you strace UML on the host, do you see it trying to get entropy
2008/6/17 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> However, i'm back to where i started as ssh isn't working, with or
>> without the rngd tool.
>> Hardware random option is set in the kernke: CONFIG_UML_RANDOM=y
> H, will take a look tonight at what happened to random fixes by Jeff.
> Rega
2008/6/17 Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
>> Ok, I checked git log, and a couple uml changes sneaked in after 2.6.26-rc6.
>> Commits f1ef9167ca4494a8c6d71d0031c73e9c8841eadd and
>> 14c8a77e1bbd693446dad297d2ae2dd22f187e4f.
>> Either try
>> http://kernel.org/pub/l
Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> Ok, I checked git log, and a couple uml changes sneaked in after 2.6.26-rc6.
> Commits f1ef9167ca4494a8c6d71d0031c73e9c8841eadd and
> 14c8a77e1bbd693446dad297d2ae2dd22f187e4f.
> Either try
> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.26-rc6-git3.bz2
> o
2008/6/16 Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Laurent,
>
> i downloaded patch 2.6.26-rc6 and applied it to the patch baseline as
> specified on the kernel site. This works but when i applied the skas 4
> patch, 2 hunks failed to apply:
Ok, I checked git log, and a couple uml changes sneaked
Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> 2008/6/16 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi Benedict, all,
>>
>> I've solved the problem, and rebased on a newer linus tree (a bit
>> after rc6). git clone
>> git://gitorious.org/low-unofficial-linux-uml-hacking-tree/mainline.git
>> I've deleted the previous
2008/6/16 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Benedict, all,
>
> I've solved the problem, and rebased on a newer linus tree (a bit
> after rc6). git clone
> git://gitorious.org/low-unofficial-linux-uml-hacking-tree/mainline.git
> I've deleted the previous repo which was becoming messy. Hop
Hi Benedict, all,
I've solved the problem, and rebased on a newer linus tree (a bit
after rc6). git clone
git://gitorious.org/low-unofficial-linux-uml-hacking-tree/mainline.git
I've deleted the previous repo which was becoming messy. Hope that one
will last longer.
Compile tested (on i386), and st
2008/6/12 Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Benedict Verheyen schreef:
>> Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
>>
>>> OK, silly me. I've (at last) finished to port the beast.
>>> Compile tested on x86_64.
>>> you can git clone
>>> git://gitorious.org/my-unofficial-linux-uml-tree/mainline.git or git
>>
Benedict Verheyen schreef:
> Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
>
>> OK, silly me. I've (at last) finished to port the beast.
>> Compile tested on x86_64.
>> you can git clone
>> git://gitorious.org/my-unofficial-linux-uml-tree/mainline.git or git
>> clone http://git.gitorious.org/my-unofficial-linux-uml-t
Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> OK, silly me. I've (at last) finished to port the beast.
> Compile tested on x86_64.
> you can git clone
> git://gitorious.org/my-unofficial-linux-uml-tree/mainline.git or git
> clone http://git.gitorious.org/my-unofficial-linux-uml-tree/mainline.git
> Laurent.
Hi,
i
2008/6/8 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/6/8 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/6/8 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> 2008/6/8 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2008/6/8 Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Benedict Verheyen schreef:
>>
>
2008/6/8 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/6/8 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/6/8 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> 2008/6/8 Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Benedict Verheyen schreef:
>
> Jeff,
>
> i googled for this patch and saw
2008/6/8 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/6/8 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/6/8 Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Benedict Verheyen schreef:
Jeff,
i googled for this patch and saw that it was commited in 2.6.26.rc2.
Does that mean th
2008/6/8 Laurent Wandrebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/6/8 Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Benedict Verheyen schreef:
>>>
>>> Jeff,
>>>
>>> i googled for this patch and saw that it was commited in 2.6.26.rc2.
>>> Does that mean that i need to compile a new 2.6.26.rc2 kernel or a new
>>>
2008/6/8 Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Benedict Verheyen schreef:
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> i googled for this patch and saw that it was commited in 2.6.26.rc2.
>> Does that mean that i need to compile a new 2.6.26.rc2 kernel or a new
>> 2.6.26.rc2 guest kernel or both ?
>>
>> Also, when i have
Benedict Verheyen schreef:
>
> Jeff,
>
> i googled for this patch and saw that it was commited in 2.6.26.rc2.
> Does that mean that i need to compile a new 2.6.26.rc2 kernel or a new
> 2.6.26.rc2 guest kernel or both ?
>
> Also, when i have compiled a new kernel, do i still need to install
> r
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 06:08:20PM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> I found an option "Hardware random number generator" in the UML config
> that sets CONFIG_UML_RANDOM.
> Together with rng-tools and a daemon program rngd, it allows injection
> of the hosts entropy into the guests /dev/random.
>
I found an option "Hardware random number generator" in the UML config
that sets CONFIG_UML_RANDOM.
Together with rng-tools and a daemon program rngd, it allows injection
of the hosts entropy into the guests /dev/random.
Maybe this will solve the problem, i'll try it out.
Regards,
Benedict
-
Cameron Kerr wrote:
> If you use -d, chances are it probably doesn't work correctly either,
> but by then its already put itself into the background and so you see
> it return.
>
> What does it '/usr/sbin/sshd' pause on when you run it inside strace?
> I'm thinking it may be that its pausing
If you use -d, chances are it probably doesn't work correctly either,
but by then its already put itself into the background and so you see
it return.
What does it '/usr/sbin/sshd' pause on when you run it inside strace?
I'm thinking it may be that its pausing because the system has run out
24 matches
Mail list logo