Re: [uml-user] segfaults with /lib/tls

2006-11-10 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 18:59, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 05:08:30PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > > I've been using a few UML hosts based on a 2.6.15.2 kernel for a few > > month. I was using them on a old 2.4.29-based host. > > > > Recently, I got a new host, running 2.6.18.

Re: [uml-user] segfaults with /lib/tls

2006-11-07 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 05:08:30PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > I've been using a few UML hosts based on a 2.6.15.2 kernel for a few > month. I was using them on a old 2.4.29-based host. > Recently, I got a new host, running 2.6.18. So I moved my /lib/tls > directory back. Bad news: the segfaul

Re: [uml-user] segfaults with /lib/tls

2006-11-07 Thread Jonas Meyer
I am running 2.6.17 on my host and 2.6.18 on the guest and I have no tls issues under i386. Try updating your guest. Jonas Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Hi, > > I've been using a few UML hosts based on a 2.6.15.2 kernel for a few > month. I was using them on a old 2.4.29-based host. > > I had some