Re: [uml-user] uml on top of xen vm (report)

2006-10-25 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, if I recall correctly (but I can't get anything to agree on this, I'm > testing on an x86_64 box however sadly) this last mapping is in an earlier > position (by one page) than it is usually, and UML uses up to the last page; > having matching sett

Re: [uml-user] uml on top of xen vm (report)

2006-10-25 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 23 October 2006 10:05, Jacques Landru wrote: > Blaisorblade wrote: > > That wonderful VNUML project! > > Yes, a neat project, thanks Fermin Galan Marquez of the Technical > University of Madrid > > > if CONFIG_HOST_* is less than CONFIG_VM_SPLIT it should not show "killed" > > - please tr

Re: [uml-user] uml on top of xen vm (report)

2006-10-23 Thread Jacques Landru
Blaisorblade wrote: > That wonderful VNUML project! > Yes, a neat project, thanks Fermin Galan Marquez of the Technical University of Madrid > > if CONFIG_HOST_* is less than CONFIG_VM_SPLIT it should not show "killed" - > please try (as a last chance) setting HOST_* to 1G/3G and VM_SPLIT of x

Re: [uml-user] uml on top of xen vm (report)

2006-10-20 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 20 October 2006 17:06, Jacques Landru wrote: > Hi, > > >It isn't a known problem, so check your setup, cross-check against a > > non-XEN > > >configuration and report it with the usual level of detail. > > First I have to say, that I am not a linux kernel expert, nor a > programmer. I ha

Re: [uml-user] uml on top of xen vm (report)

2006-10-20 Thread Jacques Landru
Hi, >It isn't a known problem, so check your setup, cross-check against a non-XEN >configuration and report it with the usual level of detail. First I have to say, that I am not a linux kernel expert, nor a programmer. I have the same problem as Nic James Ferrier. This mail is just a report o