Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 03:31:06PM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>> on a couple of UML's, i get this error:
>>
>> wait_stub_done : failed to wait for SIGTRAP, pid = 10662, n = 10662,
>> errno = 0, status = 0x1c7f
>> Stub registers -
>> 0 - 142c
>> 1 - 13
>>
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:58:49AM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> >>if you restrict the bisection to arch/um
>
> How would i do that?
git bisect start [ [...]] [--] [...]
So, starting with git bisect start -- arch/um would seem to do the trick.
Jeff
--
Work e
Jeff Dike wrote:
> This is a stock 2.6.25.4 you've using dpkg to build? If not, could
> you build a kernel.org kernel?
>
> If you see this with a stock kernel, any chance you can bisect it? I
> don't see any suspicious tls-related things between 2.6.24 and
> 2.6.25. There are ~100 changes in ar
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 07:02:49PM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>> I tried and i got this error when starting the UML:
>> arch_switch_tls failed, errno = EINVAL
>> PTRACE_SET_THREAD_AREA failed, err = -22, index = 0
>> PTRACE_SET_THREAD_AREA failed, err = -22, index = 0
>> arc
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 07:02:49PM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> I tried and i got this error when starting the UML:
> arch_switch_tls failed, errno = EINVAL
> PTRACE_SET_THREAD_AREA failed, err = -22, index = 0
> PTRACE_SET_THREAD_AREA failed, err = -22, index = 0
> arch_switch_tls failed, err
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:27:28AM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>> I'm using Debian 4.0 stable (etch) with a vanilla kernel 2.6.24.3 on the
>> host and the guest.
>
> Try upgrading the guest to 2.6.25 (the fix I'm looking at -
> 7b5cc6ee6cf9001775c348bac09814a45f1276b7
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:27:28AM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> I'm using Debian 4.0 stable (etch) with a vanilla kernel 2.6.24.3 on the
> host and the guest.
Try upgrading the guest to 2.6.25 (the fix I'm looking at -
7b5cc6ee6cf9001775c348bac09814a45f1276b7
was in 2.6.25-rc1).
> S
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:40:00PM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>> whenever i try to stop an uml to take backups
>> and afterwards want to start it again with the "go" command, i always
>> get the error "Not stopped".
>
> What version? There were some somewhat recent fixes h
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:40:00PM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> whenever i try to stop an uml to take backups
> and afterwards want to start it again with the "go" command, i always
> get the error "Not stopped".
What version? There were some somewhat recent fixes here, and this
seems to wor
Jay Shah wrote:
> How many (CPU) cores are you running on the host machine?
>
The machine has 1 CPU (1 core).
Regards,
Benedict
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studi
How many (CPU) cores are you running on the host machine?
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Benedict Verheyen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> whenever i try to stop an uml to take backups
> and afterwards want to start it again with the "go" command, i always
> get the error "Not stopped".
>
>
Hi,
whenever i try to stop an uml to take backups
and afterwards want to start it again with the "go" command, i always
get the error "Not stopped".
(testvm) stop
OK stopped
(testvm) sysrq s
OK SysRq : Emergency Sync
(testvm) go
ERR Not stopped
Anybody know why?
Thanks,
Benedict
12 matches
Mail list logo
