Hi all,
I would like to know if there is actually a working version of humfs?
I tried to apply the "patches" tarball founded on the official page but
without success.
(2.6.22 -> 2.6.25)
Does anybody has a successfull use case with recent kernels?
Thanks.
Antoine Nguyen
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 06:35:38PM +0100, Antoine Nguyen wrote:
> I've tried to apply the updated set of patches on a 2.6.24-rc1 tree
> without success :-(
>
> To build this tree,
> I downloaded a 2.6.23 archive from kernel.org and applied to it the
> latest 2.6.24-rc1 patch from the same locati
I pushed out an updated set of patches. If you apply everything up to
externfs (or extra credit, go one more to externfs-formatting), you
should have a workable humfs -
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/old/patches.html
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff,
Thank you for replying.
Jeff Dike wrote:
> I took a look at humfs yesterday, and, while it has problems, they're
> not that horrible.
The problem may be compound by another, non-humfs one then: the
symptom I have is that a kernel I built using
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 08:22:52AM +0200, Dominique Quatravaux wrote:
> I spent the whole day yesterday trying to compile a humfs-capable 2.6 UML
> kernel, and failed. I'm getting pretty desesperate. Would somebody
> please provide a source tarball that works?
I took a look at humfs yesterday, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear List,
I spent the whole day yesterday trying to compile a humfs-capable 2.6 UML
kernel, and failed. I'm getting pretty desesperate. Would somebody
please provide a source tarball that works?
Tried to apply http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net
