> Why don't you upgrade the host kernel (expecially if the bug
> is repeatable)? A permament 'D' state is a definitely a host
> bug, so it's definitely worth (also for the general and
> security fixes included) and with 2.4 it won't give
> any kind of instability (since 2.4 development is very
>
On Thursday 23 June 2005 01:03, Tim Warnock wrote:
> > If this 'D' process is permanently 'D', then that's a host
> > bug. What is the host?
> >
> > Jeff
>
> Stays permanently D
>
> Physically, its an athlon mp 2000 but theres only one of them.
> 1024mb ram, kernel 2.4.
> If this 'D' process is permanently 'D', then that's a host
> bug. What is the host?
>
> Jeff
Stays permanently D
Physically, its an athlon mp 2000 but theres only one of them.
1024mb ram, kernel 2.4.27 custom compiled to suit the hardware.
The box that works is
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 08:02:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think you must create a tap0 interface on host and pass eth0=tuntap,tap on
> command line when you you launch your vm.
Not if you're setting things up with uml_net.
> > I also get this:
> > 1751 pts/0D+ 0:00 [uml_net
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 June 2005 4:03 PM
> To: Tim Warnock
> Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [uml-user] Uml freeze on "Configuring network
> interfa
I think you must create a tap0 interface on host and pass eth0=tuntap,tap on
command line when you you launch your vm.
"Tim Warnock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ..
> Im running up debian sarge on a test box, and debian sarge as the host.
>
> Ive copied the uml_net binary from another debian sarge
Im running up debian sarge on a test box, and debian sarge as the host.
Ive copied the uml_net binary from another debian sarge box that's
working, but when I boot up the new uml I get a freeze on "Configuring
network interfaces..."
I also get this:
1751 pts/0D+ 0:00 [uml_net]
If I type
