> Why don't you upgrade the host kernel (expecially if the bug > is repeatable)? A permament 'D' state is a definitely a host > bug, so it's definitely worth (also for the general and > security fixes included) and with 2.4 it won't give > any kind of instability (since 2.4 development is very > conservative as of today).
Ok took the host up to 2.4.31 and its now happy. The only difference between the p4 box on 2.4.27 and my Athlon mp box was "config_netdev": on the p4 it was compiled in and on the athlon it was a module. I compiled it in just to be safe. By the way, for all you freenode irc fans, we use a uml for hosting/sponsoring asimov.freenode.net Thanks Tim Warnock ISP Technical Manager GetOnIt! Nationwide Internet. 1300 88 00 97 timoid (at) getonit.net.au ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
