On Thursday 27 October 2005 21:33, Hayim Shaul wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 October 2005 08:52, Hayim Shaul wrote:
> >> I've been working with UML for quite a while.
> >>
> >> Lately I upgraded to FC4 (which has forced me to upgrade the UML as
> >> well). So
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 08:52, Hayim Shaul wrote:
I've been working with UML for quite a while.
Lately I upgraded to FC4 (which has forced me to upgrade the UML as well).
So I now have a 2.6.13.3 UML kernel, root_fs=FC2.
Since this upgrade the UML
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:52:49AM +0200, Hayim Shaul wrote:
Lately I upgraded to FC4 (which has forced me to upgrade the UML as well).
Why is this?
FC4 comes with gcc-4.0, which is a more strict compiler.
linux-2.6.8.1 did not compile with gcc-4.0 so
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:52:49AM +0200, Hayim Shaul wrote:
> Lately I upgraded to FC4 (which has forced me to upgrade the UML as well).
Why is this?
Jeff
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Ge
On Thursday 27 October 2005 08:52, Hayim Shaul wrote:
> I've been working with UML for quite a while.
>
> Lately I upgraded to FC4 (which has forced me to upgrade the UML as well).
> So I now have a 2.6.13.3 UML kernel, root_fs=FC2.
>
> Since this upgrade the UML seems a lot more unstable. It crash
I've been working with UML for quite a while.
Lately I upgraded to FC4 (which has forced me to upgrade the UML as well).
So I now have a 2.6.13.3 UML kernel, root_fs=FC2.
Since this upgrade the UML seems a lot more unstable. It crashes a lot
(wher it almost never crashed before).
One major b
