On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Sunday 06 February 2005 06:43, Jim Carter wrote:
> > I'm just getting started with UML, and can't get past square 1. UML
> > just gives itself SIGSTOP. Version info:
> > --snip--
> Well, this problem was described earlier - and it's workarounded by exp
Quoting Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Checking for the skas3 patch in the host...found
Checking for /proc/mm...found
Suspended (signal)
Well, this problem was described earlier - and it's workarounded by
exporting
the env. var LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 before running UML (so that ld.so will
link
On Sunday 06 February 2005 06:43, Jim Carter wrote:
> I'm just getting started with UML, and can't get past square 1. UML
> just gives itself SIGSTOP. Version info:
>
> CPU: i86, Pentium 3 Mobile (Coppermine), 1.0 GHz
> System: Dell Inspiron 4100, 256 MB RAM
> Distro: SuSE 9.2
> Host kernel: 2.
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I'm just getting started with UML, and can't get past square 1. UML
> > just gives itself SIGSTOP. Version info:
> With bizarre behavior like this, I would suspect the host.
> Is this a kernel that's known to be able to run UML?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm just getting started with UML, and can't get past square 1. UML
> just gives itself SIGSTOP. Version info:
With bizarre behavior like this, I would suspect the host.
> Host kernel: 2.6.8 (SuSE build: kernel-default-2.6.8-24.11)
Is this a kernel that's known to b
I'm just getting started with UML, and can't get past square 1. UML
just gives itself SIGSTOP. Version info:
CPU:i86, Pentium 3 Mobile (Coppermine), 1.0 GHz
System: Dell Inspiron 4100, 256 MB RAM
Distro: SuSE 9.2
Host kernel:2.6.8 (SuSE build: kernel-default-2.6.8-
