On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:53:32PM +0100, Gordon Russell wrote:
> Any thoughts? I am a little bit of a kernel hacker from the good old days, but
> I have not done anything on 2.6 myself.
>
> If someone is already working on this could you let me know. Maybe I can help
> to
> push this forward.
I
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 12:00 PM
> To: Barry, Christopher
> Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [uml-user] SBUML status with SKAS
>
> > > Is anyone still in
> > Is anyone still involved with sbuml?
> > SBUML is one technique for saving and restoring running UML processes.
> Can you describe for me the case where this is a useful feature?
>
For me I am researching virtual processor farms as a replacement for fixed
beuwolf clusters, where nodes can mig
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 8:54 AM
> To: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [uml-user] SBUML status with SKAS
>
> Is anyone still involved with sbuml?
> SBUML is one
Is anyone still involved with sbuml?
SBUML is one technique for saving and restoring running UML processes.
I would love to get this working with the current 2.6 SKAS kernels.
I am thinking about picking this code up to see if it can be fixed, or using one
of the other core dump techniques out the
