Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-23 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 09:28, Rob Landley wrote: > On Tuesday 22 November 2005 13:38, Blaisorblade wrote: > > > I'll see this crash and raise you. I just tried vanilla 2.6.15-rc2, > > > and although it booted to a shell it crashed with the first command I > > > ran. (This is my x86 laptop,

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-23 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 09:28, Rob Landley wrote: > On Tuesday 22 November 2005 13:38, Blaisorblade wrote: > > > I'll see this crash and raise you. I just tried vanilla 2.6.15-rc2, > > > and although it booted to a shell it crashed with the first command I > > > ran. (This is my x86 laptop,

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-23 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 02:50, Jeff Dike wrote: > (Sorry about the delay, I'm in Moscow right now, and not getting much > sleep...) > > This looks like one I've already fixed. Can you check whether you > have > http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.15-rc1/patches/ >fix

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-23 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 13:38, Blaisorblade wrote: > > I'll see this crash and raise you. I just tried vanilla 2.6.15-rc2, and > > although it booted to a shell it crashed with the first command I ran. > > (This is my x86 laptop, built under ubuntu with gcc 3.3.5). Dump and > > dissassemblies

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-22 Thread Jeff Dike
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:38:03AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > 12 - bfffe08d > 811307e: 89 eb mov%ebp,%ebx > 8113080: 55 push %ebp > 8113081: 89 c5 mov%eax,%ebp > 8113083: b8 c0 00 00 00

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 21 November 2005 17:38, Rob Landley wrote: > On Monday 21 November 2005 08:58, Jeff Dike wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 02:11:50PM +0100, Joel Palmius wrote: > > > * SKAS0 mode, crash: > > ... > > > > Kernel panic - not syncing: copy_context_skas0 : failed to wait for > > > SIGUSR1/

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-21 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 21 November 2005 10:38, Rob Landley wrote: You know, it's actually _fork_ that's dying for me... > ESI: EDI: 401922e8 EBP: bfad87d8 DS: 007b ES: 007b > 088a787c:  [<08080b7d>] notifier_call_chain+0x2d/0x50 > 088a7898:  [<08071411>] panic+0x71/0x110 > 088a78b0:  [<0805e8f0>] wai

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-21 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 21 November 2005 08:58, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 02:11:50PM +0100, Joel Palmius wrote: > > * SKAS0 mode, crash: ... > > Kernel panic - not syncing: copy_context_skas0 : failed to wait for > > SIGUSR1/SIGTRAP, pid = 11008, n = 11008, errno = 0, status = 0xb7f > > Can yo

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-21 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 02:11:50PM +0100, Joel Palmius wrote: > * SKAS0 mode, crash: > Stub registers - > 0 - b000 > 1 - 1000 > 2 - 3 > 3 - 11 > 4 - 3 > 5 - 0 > 6 - b000 > 7 - 2b > 8 - 2b > 9 - 0 > 10

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-20 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 20 November 2005 19:09, Joel Palmius wrote: > Re-run with kernel from your homepage (2.6.14-bs1) and comparing with my > compile of 2.6.14-bs1. > > TT: Same result (crash) > >.. >Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode fault at addr 0x2eab, ip > 0xa002db01 > > SKAS0: Same result (

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-20 Thread Joel Palmius
Re-run with kernel from your homepage (2.6.14-bs1) and comparing with my compile of 2.6.14-bs1. TT: Same result (crash) .. Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode fault at addr 0x2eab, ip 0xa002db01 SKAS0: Same result (boots fine) SKAS3: Same result (busy hang) I'll recompile and re-te

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-20 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 19 November 2005 14:11, Joel Palmius wrote: > These tests are running on the following: >* Dual opteron running in amd64 mode >* Host kernel 2.6.14-skas3-v9-pre7 >* Host OS is gentoo >* Guest OS is vanilla stage3-athlonxp > >(suite 1) >* Guest kernel 2.6.15-rc1

[uml-user] More gentoo testing

2005-11-19 Thread Joel Palmius
These tests are running on the following: * Dual opteron running in amd64 mode * Host kernel 2.6.14-skas3-v9-pre7 * Host OS is gentoo * Guest OS is vanilla stage3-athlonxp (suite 1) * Guest kernel 2.6.15-rc1 + jeff's patches as of nov17 * Guest kernel config is defconfig + enabled

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo

2005-09-29 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 10:22, Joel Palmius wrote: > Sorry for spamming about gentoo.. :-) Don't worry. Short summary for Jeff: he gets in SKAS0 the message "cannot set up LDT for thread-local storage" at startup (correct Joel?), but he isn't using NPTL, he's rather using LinuxThreads wit

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo

2005-09-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 21:09, Joel Palmius wrote: > I always start the uml/skas0 test case via a script, which contains: > > nice linux32 ./linux-2613-2 ubd0=root_fs ubd1=swap_fs > eth0=tuntap,,,192.168.10.254 mode=skas0 mem=256m rw > (Isn't this the right way to ask for skas0 mode?) No, it

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo

2005-09-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 19:45, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 16:02, Joel Palmius wrote: > > Lengthy.. Summary is that on an amd64 host, uml hangs on skas0 mode if > > the host kernel has been patched with -v9-pre7. > > Using an unpatched vanilla > > host kernel, skas0 boo

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo

2005-09-28 Thread Joel Palmius
Sorry for spamming about gentoo.. :-) I'm now stuck at getting a functional system up and running. The problem I have is a catch 22: I cannot run an athlon-xp tarball in skas0 because it complains with the dreaded "cannot set up LDT for thread-local storage", and I don't want to run a tarball

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo

2005-09-27 Thread Joel Palmius
I always start the uml/skas0 test case via a script, which contains: nice linux32 ./linux-2613-2 ubd0=root_fs ubd1=swap_fs eth0=tuntap,,,192.168.10.254 mode=skas0 mem=256m rw (Isn't this the right way to ask for skas0 mode?) // Joel On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Blaisorblade wrote: On Tuesday 27

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo

2005-09-27 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 16:02, Joel Palmius wrote: > Lengthy.. Summary is that on an amd64 host, uml hangs on skas0 mode if the > host kernel has been patched with -v9-pre7. > Using an unpatched vanilla > host kernel, skas0 boots. Why this is so I have no clue, ask someone else. Have you cor

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo

2005-09-27 Thread Joel Palmius
As an addition: The stage tarball is a x86 (i386) one. Trying to use for example an athlon-xp stage tarball crashes with "cannot set up LDT for thread-local storage" // Joel On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Joel Palmius wrote: Lengthy.. Summary is that on an amd64 host, uml hangs on skas0 mode if the

[uml-user] More gentoo

2005-09-27 Thread Joel Palmius
Lengthy.. Summary is that on an amd64 host, uml hangs on skas0 mode if the host kernel has been patched with -v9-pre7. Using an unpatched vanilla host kernel, skas0 boots. Why this is so I have no clue, ask someone else. :-) Further, 2.6.12-bs11 refuses to attempt running in skas0 on an unpatc