On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:19:55PM -0400, lanas wrote:
> Thanks. It makes me think that I saw once that there's an option to
> do a make modules_install with an actual target directory instead of
> assuming that the modules must be on the same filesystem as the sources
> of the kernel.
INSTALL_M
Le Lundi, 28 Avril 2008 12:45:30 -0400,
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:44:13AM -0400, lanas wrote:
>> And the UML kernel was built uisng 2.6.24.2.
>>
>> Is the solution to this to replace the kernel (i.e. installaing
>> it complete with modules) inside t
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:44:13AM -0400, lanas wrote:
> That system tries to load ipSec and in turn ipSec complains that
> the /lib/modules/2.6.24.2 directory can't be found.
>
> Of course it won't be found because that system was initially built
> using 2.6.18-6-gx1. I copied it into a flat
Hi,
I'm bringing back to virtual life, so to speak, an already existing
real system by making a fs that UML can boot against. It boots and
works so far basically OK. There's a point I'm not clear about.
That system tries to load ipSec and in turn ipSec complains that
the /lib/modules/2.6.24
