Re: [uml-user] Apache segfaults at every request

2006-11-26 Thread Nix
On 13 Nov 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > On Sunday 12 November 2006 21:38, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:53:36PM +0100, >> Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >> >> a message of 34 lines which said: >> > 2.6 kernels can run on 2.4 systems >> >> Each time I try, I g

Re: [uml-user] Apache segfaults at every request

2006-11-21 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:14:53PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 31 lines which said: > I just upgraded the machine to Debian "testing", etch. Since then, > Apache (and, apparently, Squid) segfaults at *every* request. Two weeks after, I upgraded ("testing"

Re: [uml-user] Apache segfaults at every request

2006-11-21 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 22:45, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:14:53PM +0100, > Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > a message of 31 lines which said: > > I just upgraded the machine to Debian "testing", etch. Since then, > > Apache (and, apparently, Squid

Re: [uml-user] Apache segfaults at every request

2006-11-14 Thread Matthias Ferdinand
--On Montag, November 13, 2006 11:02:00 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Each time I try, I get a "FATAL kernel is too old". > Strange - that is only valid for a software using TLS. I've also seen this message from statically linked binaries (developed on recent glibc systems) when running on s

Re: [uml-user] Apache segfaults at every request

2006-11-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 12 November 2006 21:38, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:53:36PM +0100, > Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > a message of 34 lines which said: > > 2.6 kernels can run on 2.4 systems > > Each time I try, I get a "FATAL kernel is too old". Strange - that is

Re: [uml-user] Apache segfaults at every request

2006-11-12 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 09:38:24PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:53:36PM +0100, > Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 34 lines which said: > > > 2.6 kernels can run on 2.4 systems > > Each time I try, I get a "FATAL kernel is too old". >From

Re: [uml-user] Apache segfaults at every request

2006-11-12 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:53:36PM +0100, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 34 lines which said: > 2.6 kernels can run on 2.4 systems Each time I try, I get a "FATAL kernel is too old". - Using Tomcat bu

Re: [uml-user] Apache segfaults at every request

2006-11-10 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 06 November 2006 15:14, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > I have a UML machine running kernel 2.4.18-17um. It used Debian > "stable", sarge. > > I just upgraded the machine to Debian "testing", etch. Since then, > Apache (and, apparently, Squid) segfaults at *every* request. > > [Sun Nov 05 16

Re: [uml-user] Apache segfaults at every request

2006-11-08 Thread Jeff Dike
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:14:53PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > I have a UML machine running kernel 2.4.18-17um. It used Debian > "stable", sarge. > > I just upgraded the machine to Debian "testing", etch. Since then, > Apache (and, apparently, Squid) segfaults at *every* request. 2.4 UML

[uml-user] Apache segfaults at every request

2006-11-06 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
I have a UML machine running kernel 2.4.18-17um. It used Debian "stable", sarge. I just upgraded the machine to Debian "testing", etch. Since then, Apache (and, apparently, Squid) segfaults at *every* request. [Sun Nov 05 16:23:42 2006] [notice] Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) configured -- resuming norm