clowncoder wrote:
> I get a strange behaviour as far as isolation is concerned between an
> uml machine
> and the host, my uml machine is isolated from any network,
> if firefox is already running in the host, running firefox in the uml
> machine creates
> an instance of firefox that is not isol
Sven Köhler wrote:
> arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c: In function 'get_thread_regs':
> arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:137: error: 'JB_PC' undeclared
> (first use in this function)
Jeff Dike posted this link
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.17-rc4/patches/jmp
Sven Köhler wrote:
> has anybody of you gentoo-users out there (maybe Blaisorblade?) tried
> UML with glibc 2.4 (which seems to be nptlonly!)?
Yes.
> Does it compile? Does it work?
Yes. Yes.
I've been using a nptlonly glibc 2.3.x on a Gentoo system for a long time and
have only once had a real
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 09:00:16PM +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> > I followed your advice and here is the stack trace I came up with
> > (patching panic.c was not neccessary):
>
> With this, I'm going to need to know how to reproduce it. Giving
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:14:42PM +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> > How do I get a stack trace?
>
> Attach gdb to the first UML pid, put a breakpoint on panic, continue it,
> and when it hits the breakpoint, do 'bt' at gdb.
>
> If the breakp
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:57:32AM +0200, Markus Sch?nhaber wrote:
> > My UML kernel frequently crashes just printing
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG!
> > on the console.
>
> No stack trace?
No.
> > Any hints how to solve this or what I can do to track this down?
>
> Get a
Hello!
My UML kernel frequently crashes just printing
Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG!
on the console. This seems to happen when there's a lot of disk i/o for
example during "emerge --sync" or when compiling gcc.
I'm using a 2.6.15-gentoo-r1 kernel on the host and a 2.6.16.1 UML kernel with
bb1
